My 2018 in review, in blogs and photos:
Started the year visiting Austin, Texas for the first time since 2009 and worked part-time for four glorious months (and did some very good work, if I do say so myself) for a nonprofit based there, then ended the year doing an all-day workshop for an Oregon state agency (felt great to design and deliver an all-day workshop after so long). No work in between that but it sure was nice starting and ending on high notes.
Attended US Senator Jeff Merkley's January 2018 Town Hall in Banks, Oregon and US Senator Ron Wyden's February 2018 Town Hall in Hillsboro, and US Representative Suzanne Bonamici's town hall in Banks, volunteered with the local chapter of the League of Women Voters, and tried to get people to vote in the November 2018 election.
Got a hand-cranked pasta maker from a neighbor who didn't use it anymore (still struggling to use it correctly) and went on many cooking adventures. I started to enjoy it a couple of years ago. Even made my first decent lasagna.
Visited Cape Meres on a day trip via motorcycle and going up Mount Hebo via Siuslaw National Forest Service Road 14 TWICE.
Was inspired by Agnes De Mille.
Got a tweet from Strong Bad.
Took my first ever off-road motorcycle riding class. It wasn't that the experience itself was fantastic - I was terrified through most of it. The reason it was a highlight was how much it improved my riding.
Saw a few hours of incredible riding by police motorcycle riders at the North American Motor Officers Association (NAMOA) Annual Conference in May 2018 in Hillsboro, Oregon
Consulted with Afghan media reps & a media relations officer and, a few weeks later, with NGO visitors from Kazakhstan gifts visiting Portland, Oregon.
Went to Horning's Hideout for the first time (and a wedding together, besides our own, for the first time) and to Dundee Lodge in Gaston for the first time.
Hosted a world traveling bicycle rider.
Attended my first ever OMSI science pub night in Hillsboro, Oregon (to hear about the SOPHIA telescope)
Camped and hiked at Camp Wilkerson County Park in Oregon, at Brooks Memorial State Park in Washington state, and at Cottonwood Canyon State Park in Oregon - and hiked University Falls again.
Helped at a Friends of Family Farmer's event in Portland, Oregon.
Visited Rachel, Nevada with Stefan - our second visits, but our first together, and my first via a motorcycle.
Saw Smokey and the Bandit on the big screen after Burt Reynolds died and talked about Burt Reynolds instead of politics - at least for a few minutes. And seeing Hooper for the first time since I saw it in a theater a million years ago and realizing there's a point where Reynolds, driving through a Western movie set really fast in order to scare an assistant to a director, yells out of the window, "Hey, Jane Ann!" Which is my name...
Finally seeing the entire first seasons of Doctor Who. Okay, I get the appeal now - but you really do have to start from the very start of the reboot.
My wonderful neighbors, especially Virgil, continued to be wonderful
Walked Jaxson the dog most every weekday - and even hosted him overnight a few times.
Saw Mark Haffner for the first time in almost 30 years.
Every precious moment with our beloved Lucinda.
My moment of greatest accomplishment: riding around the Steens Mountain before the rest of our incredible trip through Nevada. And finally getting a crash on gravel over with.
The low point of the year? Losing Gray Max, my beloved cat. Every day I miss him and mourn him. Our home just does not feel the same without him. So many moments in the day are empty without him.
Bittersweet moment of the year: Daisy Dog passing away. Which was terribly sad... but I take great comfort in knowing just how much she was loved the last 4 1/2 years of her life.
And the blog I'm most proud of: Storytelling - a blog about a dream job and a long lost memory found again.
The year in review in photos.
Happy Holidays and here's to 2019
Topics: traveling, motorcycle adventures, camping, books read, movies seen, feeling like a foreigner in Oregon, dogs and my values. Stravaig (pronounced straw vague) is an Irish/Scottish word. Means to wander about aimlessly. Probably from an even older, obsolete word, extravage, meaning to digress or ramble. I am all about stravaig, both when traveling & in conversations.
Wednesday, December 26, 2018
Friday, December 14, 2018
Storytelling
It started with a post on Facebook. It was for a job as communications director. I clicked on the link and it turned out to be a job opening at the legendary Appalshop. Since 1969, this amazing nonprofit has documented and celebrated the life, culture and voice of people living in Appalachia and all of rural America. Appalshop is based in Whitesburg, Kentucky and houses an art gallery, 150-seat theater, a community radio station, a regional archive and media production and training facilities. Appalshop supports rural communities’ efforts to achieve justice and equity and solve their own problems in their own ways.
I've never been to Appalshop, but I've heard so much about Appalshop for so many years. To me, Appalshop represents the reality that you can be rural and progressive, that you can be rural and embrace diversity, that you can celebrate your past and welcome, and participate in, an evolving future. Appalshop is the embodiment of just how wonderful, strong and poetic Kentuckians, and all rural Americans, can be. I love talking to AmeriCorps members who have served in rural Kentucky, including outside Appalachia - they go on and on about the people there and what it was like to help them with education issues, environmental issues... and I'd see the understanding in their eyes: they get what makes the state and the people special when they are at their very best.
Appalshop is the kind of nonprofit I wish existed in different places all over the world, in a form appropriate for the local area, to celebrate the unique rural life of so many, many different places, which have their own heritage worth celebrating - their own unique takes on food and music and how they relate to their natural resources. When we travel by motorcycle, we want to stop in little towns, not big cities, and whether that's been in Hungary or Bulgaria or Poland or British Columbia or Idaho or just about anywhere in Oregon, it's often been as wonderful as a twisty, scenic road we've enjoyed.
My heart raced all day thinking about that job posting. Oh, to be in a position to apply for a job like that, to uproot my life yet again and go several hundred, or even a few thousand, miles away yet again for a dream job that pays so little in a beautiful place I'd love to be. If I were 20 years younger and alone...
As much as I love Appalshop, I'm not willing to trade my husband and current home for it. I'll just keep hoping I win the lottery so I can give it lots of money someday.
I clicked around the site, reveling in all they do, listening to the WMMT radio station for a while. And then I saw a title and a photo. Red Fox/Second Hangin'.
And I burst into tears.
A memory flooded all through me, of my Dad insisting on taking me to Henderson County High School for a theater touring company. Some kind of play. But with no props or scenery. storytelling. Three men. I was skeptical. But my attention never wained that night. I drank in every word of that story. I was astounded at the magic of three men just talking.
I'd seen Red Fox/Second Hangin'. At my Dad's insistence. I had forgotten the name of the play. I assumed I'd never remember it.
I was a mystery to my Dad - and a disappointment to both parents. They just couldn't understand why I didn't want to dress the way they wanted me to, to dress like the other girls. Other than some unfortunate experimentation with blue eye shadow, I wasn't really interested in makeup until some time at college. Didn't want to join Cotillion, didn't want to join a sorority, rolled my eyes at the idea of participating in Junior Miss. Didn't date - instead, went out with a pack of friends, if I went out at all. Walked out the door on some Saturday nights for midnight showings of the "Rocky Horror Picture Show" looking like their worst nightmare. Watching "Star Wars" over and over and over and over when it came on HBO. Silence in response to my parents repeated insistence that I could make a lot of money and have a great time being a public relations director some day for Peabody Coal Company or some other similar company - me, their daughter who, at 11 years old, wept at the idea of my Mom applying for a job with Union Carbide (she didn't get the job, FYI). Dad was desperate for me to be friends with certain girls from certain families - I resented giving up a night of watching a foreign film or Monty Python on the local PBS station to, instead, hang out with someone I really didn't like at all.
But Dad knew I loved theater and musicals. He made me watch The Sound of Music. I hadn't wanted to. He was right: I loved it. He took me to the Executive Inn Dinner Theater in Evansville, Indiana for performances of South Pacific and Ten Nights in a Barroom, and arranged beforehand for the main actress in each production to talk to me about working in professional theater. He's made a HUGE deal about a local theater company mounting a production in a conference room at the Ramada Inn in Henderson - it was A Light in the Forest, a play he didn't know, by an author he'd never heard of, but it was live theater and, therefore, I had to go. I was the only kid in the audience.
And once upon a time, he'd taken me to see the Red Fox/Second Hangin' storytellers. And I had forgotton the name, but not that night. I had always wondered if I would ever remember the name of that show.
Now, I won't have to.
If you want to watch it, it's free on YouTube.
I've never been to Appalshop, but I've heard so much about Appalshop for so many years. To me, Appalshop represents the reality that you can be rural and progressive, that you can be rural and embrace diversity, that you can celebrate your past and welcome, and participate in, an evolving future. Appalshop is the embodiment of just how wonderful, strong and poetic Kentuckians, and all rural Americans, can be. I love talking to AmeriCorps members who have served in rural Kentucky, including outside Appalachia - they go on and on about the people there and what it was like to help them with education issues, environmental issues... and I'd see the understanding in their eyes: they get what makes the state and the people special when they are at their very best.
Appalshop is the kind of nonprofit I wish existed in different places all over the world, in a form appropriate for the local area, to celebrate the unique rural life of so many, many different places, which have their own heritage worth celebrating - their own unique takes on food and music and how they relate to their natural resources. When we travel by motorcycle, we want to stop in little towns, not big cities, and whether that's been in Hungary or Bulgaria or Poland or British Columbia or Idaho or just about anywhere in Oregon, it's often been as wonderful as a twisty, scenic road we've enjoyed.
My heart raced all day thinking about that job posting. Oh, to be in a position to apply for a job like that, to uproot my life yet again and go several hundred, or even a few thousand, miles away yet again for a dream job that pays so little in a beautiful place I'd love to be. If I were 20 years younger and alone...
As much as I love Appalshop, I'm not willing to trade my husband and current home for it. I'll just keep hoping I win the lottery so I can give it lots of money someday.
I clicked around the site, reveling in all they do, listening to the WMMT radio station for a while. And then I saw a title and a photo. Red Fox/Second Hangin'.
And I burst into tears.
A memory flooded all through me, of my Dad insisting on taking me to Henderson County High School for a theater touring company. Some kind of play. But with no props or scenery. storytelling. Three men. I was skeptical. But my attention never wained that night. I drank in every word of that story. I was astounded at the magic of three men just talking.
I'd seen Red Fox/Second Hangin'. At my Dad's insistence. I had forgotten the name of the play. I assumed I'd never remember it.
I was a mystery to my Dad - and a disappointment to both parents. They just couldn't understand why I didn't want to dress the way they wanted me to, to dress like the other girls. Other than some unfortunate experimentation with blue eye shadow, I wasn't really interested in makeup until some time at college. Didn't want to join Cotillion, didn't want to join a sorority, rolled my eyes at the idea of participating in Junior Miss. Didn't date - instead, went out with a pack of friends, if I went out at all. Walked out the door on some Saturday nights for midnight showings of the "Rocky Horror Picture Show" looking like their worst nightmare. Watching "Star Wars" over and over and over and over when it came on HBO. Silence in response to my parents repeated insistence that I could make a lot of money and have a great time being a public relations director some day for Peabody Coal Company or some other similar company - me, their daughter who, at 11 years old, wept at the idea of my Mom applying for a job with Union Carbide (she didn't get the job, FYI). Dad was desperate for me to be friends with certain girls from certain families - I resented giving up a night of watching a foreign film or Monty Python on the local PBS station to, instead, hang out with someone I really didn't like at all.
But Dad knew I loved theater and musicals. He made me watch The Sound of Music. I hadn't wanted to. He was right: I loved it. He took me to the Executive Inn Dinner Theater in Evansville, Indiana for performances of South Pacific and Ten Nights in a Barroom, and arranged beforehand for the main actress in each production to talk to me about working in professional theater. He's made a HUGE deal about a local theater company mounting a production in a conference room at the Ramada Inn in Henderson - it was A Light in the Forest, a play he didn't know, by an author he'd never heard of, but it was live theater and, therefore, I had to go. I was the only kid in the audience.
And once upon a time, he'd taken me to see the Red Fox/Second Hangin' storytellers. And I had forgotton the name, but not that night. I had always wondered if I would ever remember the name of that show.
Now, I won't have to.
If you want to watch it, it's free on YouTube.
Friday, December 7, 2018
Missing Gray Max
Early on, when Gray Max came into my life, I started singing him my own version of My Bonnie Lies Over the Ocean:
My Gray Max sails over the ocean.
My Gray Max sails over the sea.
My Gray Max sails over the ocean.
Oh bring back my Gray Max to me...
He loved to be held and petted while I sang that over and over. And I was happy to oblige.
Sometime between 10:30 a.m. and 3:30 p.m. on Tuesday, October 30, my beloved Gray Max went missing. When I went outside to feed him that cold and wet afternoon and called and called and he didn't come, I knew he was gone. Because Max always comes when I call, and on a day like that, he wouldn't be far. Even if he was at my neighbors, on the porch, with his buddy, my neighbor's cat, Trouble - they liked to hang out - he always came when called.
The rain and cold continued as night fell, and my dread continued. I held out hope that he'd somehow show up that evening, but he didn't. When I got up Halloween morning, I went to the backdoor immediately - and he wasn't there, those glowing eyes looking through the back window, waiting for me to let him in.
It's been 37 days. I miss him so much it's unbearable at times. But I don't think my Gray Max is coming back.
So many of you already know the story: we moved into our home in January 2013 and sometime after that, sitting outside in our backyard, enjoying a fire in the firepit, Stefan said, "We have a visitor." There, a few feet from where we were sitting, was Gray Max, sitting still, listening to us. After some cajoling sweet talk from me, he came over for some petting. The next visit, probably the next night, I dared to pick him up, and after that, he was happy to jump on my lap.
I assumed he belonged to some neighbor nearby: he looked well fed, he was fixed and he loved being with people. But it turned out he was being taken care of by a crazy neighbor who fed and housed six other cats - she said he'd shown up one day and never left, but that he never seemed interested in hanging out with her, though he tolerated all the cats and her two dogs. He sure loved hanging out with me.
She called him "Max." I called him "Not my cat," because Stefan and I had an agreement when we got married: no cats. For the next 20 months or so, I kept saying he was "Not my cat," though I called him "Gray Max" - I just thought that suited him more. And very quickly after that I started calling him "Graaaaay", and when I did, he would come running to me. I didn't feed him, but he loved being with me. And since our dog at the time, Albi, was blind, she couldn't see him to chase him, so we would all hang out together - Gray Max tolerated most dogs.
Gray Max hung out with me in the yard always when I gardened. I violated the house rules and let him come in on my lap in the afternoons. When it got colder, I would close him up for the night in the guest room. When he got ripped open by a raccoon, I paid the bill to get him fixed up, but his "real" owner, the crazy neighbor, kept him housed up in her apartment for recovery. He wouldn't let her pick him up, and even bit her once when she tried - but he loved when I picked him up and kissed his face over and over.
Two days before we put Albi down, I gave her a bath - I didn't want her to smell like pee for her last days on Earth - and we lay in the yard outside together in the sun. Gray Max joined us.
After Albi died, I went for nine months without a dog. I haven't gone without a dog since I was 24 years old. Gray Max was my dog. He followed me all over the house and all over the yard - all before I ever started feeding him. At one point, a raccoon did some serious damage to him, and I laid out a few hundred dollars to get him sewn up. My crazy neighbor kept him inside during his recovery, much to his outrage and frustration. He healed up nicely - and it was just another reason for him to dislike her and like me more.
Then, in October 2014, my neighbor died. I had to find homes for her cats and her two dogs. But I knew I was going to take Gray Max. I couldn't bear the idea of someone else having him nor the idea of not having him in my life. He was a part of my home - and I spend a great deal of time in this house. I just couldn't imagine this home without him.
I got a discarded dog crate for airline travel and converted it into a cat house for the winter. Gray Max often preferred to be outside, even overnight, and he immediately loved the house. I asked Stefan to build cat ladders on both sides of our backyard fence, and he did. Then I asked him to build a platform for the cat crate, so Gray Max could be well off the ground, but his crate wouldn't take up any space on the porch and would still be under the roof, and he did.
Here's a blog I wrote months ago, but never got around to publishing:
The dog and cat dynamics of my house.
Inside in the morning, before meals: if the Gray Max the Cat comes in from outside, Lucinda the Dog does this sniffy, chewy thing on his head, and he loves it. He pushes his head up against her mouth for more.
If I lay down on the couch, Max sleeps on my belly. Lucy sleeps on her bed in the living room or comes over to the couch so I'll pet her. More head chewing if Max leans over.
If Stefan's radio alarm goes off, Lucy begins bouncing around the living room and making a noise like an excited Chewbacca. Max used to panic and hide behind the couch, but now he just stands there, waiting for me to come back and feed him.
Inside in the morning, after meals: if I'm in the floor, petting Lucinda, she will carefully maneuver so that she is in front of me, partially on my lap, so that she can see Max if he approaches and push him away with a paw. Max will circle us both, sometimes getting close enough to give my hand or Lucy a lick. If he licks Lucy in the same direction as her fur, he'll give her several licks. If he licks Lucy against her fur, he will jump back as though he's licked a needle.
Inside in the evenings, after meals: Gray Max lays on my lap as I sit on the couch. Lucy comes over and positions herself in front of me so as to say, "Pet my bum." Sometimes, Max puts his paw out and places it on her rump for a few seconds. No attempt at head chewing - in fact, Max meows great annoyance at her.
When both animals are outside: if Max has just gone outside, and Lucy rushes out or is already outside, she will tear after him and he will dash up the fence and away from her as quickly as possible. If Lucy is already outside and Max gets over the fence and onto the porch, he'll stand right at the door and she will stand out in the yard and bark - she won't come near him.
And sometimes, Max will walk across the living room and Lucy will try to play and Max will meow great annoyance while continuing to walk wherever he is going.
I have always wanted a dog and a cat.
Of course, I have also wanted a donkey, goats, and chickens. But I knew the farm animals were probably NOT going to happen for me - and now, unless we win the lottery and get to buy a ranch, it's not happening.
But I do I have a dog and a cat.
In the last several months, more and more, Max would stay indoors as day ended, laying on my lap most evenings, content while I watched TV. He snuck into the bedroom a few times, but I'd put him outside when I found him and he quickly got the message - no bedroom.
And Stefan didn't divorce me, though it frustrated him so, so much to have a cat in the house. He barely tolerated it all because he knew how much I loved Gray Max.
When we adopted Lucinda, I was determined for her to at least tolerate Gray Max, and vice versa. Gray Max had lived in a home with two dogs with my neighbor, so I knew it was possible. I brought Max into the house with Lucy after we'd had her for a week and then just sat on the couch while Max howled at the back door and Lucy lay alert in the floor, staring at him. It took about two hours for the howling to stop and for Max to finally wander over to the couch and sit on my lap. But within just a couple of days, they were fine together in the house. It took about two years for Lucy to stop chasing Max in the backyard, however, and she still loved to just start barking her head off at him when they were both out there - he would just lay wherever he was and wait for me to come tell her to stop. They did sometimes sleep together - in the floor of the living room or out in the backyard. I loved finding them next to each other. I even found Gray Max in Lucinda's bed a few times - she really didn't know what to think about that.
In the last two years, I had to make sure Gray Max was in the house when I walked Lucy because, otherwise, he'd follow us. Stefan once realized he was with them four blocks away. Max was obsessed with following Lucy outside the house (but never inside). If he stayed out all night, then when I let him in in the mornings, he would happily tolerate Lucy's morning sniffs and nibbles all over his face. They were buddies, no question. And I loved it. I had wanted a dog and a cat, at the same time, since I was a little girl. It was a dream come true.
Gray Max was around 6 or 7 years old when he came into my life in 2013. Earlier this year, I took him to the vet for his annual shots and because he had so obviously lost weight - a few people had commented on it. The vet did tests and said he was absolutely fine but to switch him to wet food entirely. I did, and he gained weight and seemed absolutely his usual self. You could tell he was 11 or more years old - his sides were sunken in that old man way - but otherwise, he was fine: great appetite, still active, still liked to play a bit.
There were only two things that I wondered about: firstly, he suddenly decided he hated all dogs that dared to walk by our house, moving in to attack as they approached. I often had to pick him up and hold him as dogs passed. The other thing was that he started trying to sleep in my bed again. We started catching him again in the bedroom - always on my side, snuggled down, looking so content - it concerned me because it meant he preferred being in dark and quiet more than being on my lap, and I thought that might be a sign of... oh, I dunno... something... but I still don't think he slunk off and died. He wasn't sick. He was in fine form and spirits and appetite. I had been thinking of a way to make him an entirely indoor cat, but two things were stopping me: there was nowhere Stefan would tolerate a litter box, and Max loved being outside. He absolutely loved it. And since he never went far without Lucy, I thought we could go with this lifestyle for at least a couple of more years.
But Gray Max is gone now. The day after he disappeared, I walked along all the surrounding streets to make sure he wasn't on the side of one, hit by a car. I've posted flyers all over the neighborhood. I've posted online. I've registered with the local animal shelter's lost and found. But Gray Max has not been found.
My guess is that another animal got him - a raccoon or even a coyote. I just wish we could have found the body. And I hate the idea of him dying somewhere, alone, cold and in pain.
I miss Gray Max on my lap, or snuggled up against me on the couch. Or next to me in the yard. I miss his howl of demand to open the door to go out or come in. I miss his look of frustrated as Lucinda stood over him barking. I miss him beyond anything I can put into words. I think Lucinda misses him too.
My Gray Max sails over the ocean.
My Gray Max sails over the sea.
My Gray Max sails over the ocean.
Oh bring back my Gray Max to me...
He loved to be held and petted while I sang that over and over. And I was happy to oblige.
Sometime between 10:30 a.m. and 3:30 p.m. on Tuesday, October 30, my beloved Gray Max went missing. When I went outside to feed him that cold and wet afternoon and called and called and he didn't come, I knew he was gone. Because Max always comes when I call, and on a day like that, he wouldn't be far. Even if he was at my neighbors, on the porch, with his buddy, my neighbor's cat, Trouble - they liked to hang out - he always came when called.
The rain and cold continued as night fell, and my dread continued. I held out hope that he'd somehow show up that evening, but he didn't. When I got up Halloween morning, I went to the backdoor immediately - and he wasn't there, those glowing eyes looking through the back window, waiting for me to let him in.
It's been 37 days. I miss him so much it's unbearable at times. But I don't think my Gray Max is coming back.
So many of you already know the story: we moved into our home in January 2013 and sometime after that, sitting outside in our backyard, enjoying a fire in the firepit, Stefan said, "We have a visitor." There, a few feet from where we were sitting, was Gray Max, sitting still, listening to us. After some cajoling sweet talk from me, he came over for some petting. The next visit, probably the next night, I dared to pick him up, and after that, he was happy to jump on my lap.
I assumed he belonged to some neighbor nearby: he looked well fed, he was fixed and he loved being with people. But it turned out he was being taken care of by a crazy neighbor who fed and housed six other cats - she said he'd shown up one day and never left, but that he never seemed interested in hanging out with her, though he tolerated all the cats and her two dogs. He sure loved hanging out with me.
She called him "Max." I called him "Not my cat," because Stefan and I had an agreement when we got married: no cats. For the next 20 months or so, I kept saying he was "Not my cat," though I called him "Gray Max" - I just thought that suited him more. And very quickly after that I started calling him "Graaaaay", and when I did, he would come running to me. I didn't feed him, but he loved being with me. And since our dog at the time, Albi, was blind, she couldn't see him to chase him, so we would all hang out together - Gray Max tolerated most dogs.
Gray Max hung out with me in the yard always when I gardened. I violated the house rules and let him come in on my lap in the afternoons. When it got colder, I would close him up for the night in the guest room. When he got ripped open by a raccoon, I paid the bill to get him fixed up, but his "real" owner, the crazy neighbor, kept him housed up in her apartment for recovery. He wouldn't let her pick him up, and even bit her once when she tried - but he loved when I picked him up and kissed his face over and over.
Two days before we put Albi down, I gave her a bath - I didn't want her to smell like pee for her last days on Earth - and we lay in the yard outside together in the sun. Gray Max joined us.
After Albi died, I went for nine months without a dog. I haven't gone without a dog since I was 24 years old. Gray Max was my dog. He followed me all over the house and all over the yard - all before I ever started feeding him. At one point, a raccoon did some serious damage to him, and I laid out a few hundred dollars to get him sewn up. My crazy neighbor kept him inside during his recovery, much to his outrage and frustration. He healed up nicely - and it was just another reason for him to dislike her and like me more.
Then, in October 2014, my neighbor died. I had to find homes for her cats and her two dogs. But I knew I was going to take Gray Max. I couldn't bear the idea of someone else having him nor the idea of not having him in my life. He was a part of my home - and I spend a great deal of time in this house. I just couldn't imagine this home without him.
I got a discarded dog crate for airline travel and converted it into a cat house for the winter. Gray Max often preferred to be outside, even overnight, and he immediately loved the house. I asked Stefan to build cat ladders on both sides of our backyard fence, and he did. Then I asked him to build a platform for the cat crate, so Gray Max could be well off the ground, but his crate wouldn't take up any space on the porch and would still be under the roof, and he did.
Here's a blog I wrote months ago, but never got around to publishing:
The dog and cat dynamics of my house.
Inside in the morning, before meals: if the Gray Max the Cat comes in from outside, Lucinda the Dog does this sniffy, chewy thing on his head, and he loves it. He pushes his head up against her mouth for more.
If I lay down on the couch, Max sleeps on my belly. Lucy sleeps on her bed in the living room or comes over to the couch so I'll pet her. More head chewing if Max leans over.
If Stefan's radio alarm goes off, Lucy begins bouncing around the living room and making a noise like an excited Chewbacca. Max used to panic and hide behind the couch, but now he just stands there, waiting for me to come back and feed him.
Inside in the morning, after meals: if I'm in the floor, petting Lucinda, she will carefully maneuver so that she is in front of me, partially on my lap, so that she can see Max if he approaches and push him away with a paw. Max will circle us both, sometimes getting close enough to give my hand or Lucy a lick. If he licks Lucy in the same direction as her fur, he'll give her several licks. If he licks Lucy against her fur, he will jump back as though he's licked a needle.
Inside in the evenings, after meals: Gray Max lays on my lap as I sit on the couch. Lucy comes over and positions herself in front of me so as to say, "Pet my bum." Sometimes, Max puts his paw out and places it on her rump for a few seconds. No attempt at head chewing - in fact, Max meows great annoyance at her.
When both animals are outside: if Max has just gone outside, and Lucy rushes out or is already outside, she will tear after him and he will dash up the fence and away from her as quickly as possible. If Lucy is already outside and Max gets over the fence and onto the porch, he'll stand right at the door and she will stand out in the yard and bark - she won't come near him.
And sometimes, Max will walk across the living room and Lucy will try to play and Max will meow great annoyance while continuing to walk wherever he is going.
I have always wanted a dog and a cat.
Of course, I have also wanted a donkey, goats, and chickens. But I knew the farm animals were probably NOT going to happen for me - and now, unless we win the lottery and get to buy a ranch, it's not happening.
But I do I have a dog and a cat.
In the last several months, more and more, Max would stay indoors as day ended, laying on my lap most evenings, content while I watched TV. He snuck into the bedroom a few times, but I'd put him outside when I found him and he quickly got the message - no bedroom.
And Stefan didn't divorce me, though it frustrated him so, so much to have a cat in the house. He barely tolerated it all because he knew how much I loved Gray Max.
When we adopted Lucinda, I was determined for her to at least tolerate Gray Max, and vice versa. Gray Max had lived in a home with two dogs with my neighbor, so I knew it was possible. I brought Max into the house with Lucy after we'd had her for a week and then just sat on the couch while Max howled at the back door and Lucy lay alert in the floor, staring at him. It took about two hours for the howling to stop and for Max to finally wander over to the couch and sit on my lap. But within just a couple of days, they were fine together in the house. It took about two years for Lucy to stop chasing Max in the backyard, however, and she still loved to just start barking her head off at him when they were both out there - he would just lay wherever he was and wait for me to come tell her to stop. They did sometimes sleep together - in the floor of the living room or out in the backyard. I loved finding them next to each other. I even found Gray Max in Lucinda's bed a few times - she really didn't know what to think about that.
In the last two years, I had to make sure Gray Max was in the house when I walked Lucy because, otherwise, he'd follow us. Stefan once realized he was with them four blocks away. Max was obsessed with following Lucy outside the house (but never inside). If he stayed out all night, then when I let him in in the mornings, he would happily tolerate Lucy's morning sniffs and nibbles all over his face. They were buddies, no question. And I loved it. I had wanted a dog and a cat, at the same time, since I was a little girl. It was a dream come true.
Gray Max was around 6 or 7 years old when he came into my life in 2013. Earlier this year, I took him to the vet for his annual shots and because he had so obviously lost weight - a few people had commented on it. The vet did tests and said he was absolutely fine but to switch him to wet food entirely. I did, and he gained weight and seemed absolutely his usual self. You could tell he was 11 or more years old - his sides were sunken in that old man way - but otherwise, he was fine: great appetite, still active, still liked to play a bit.
There were only two things that I wondered about: firstly, he suddenly decided he hated all dogs that dared to walk by our house, moving in to attack as they approached. I often had to pick him up and hold him as dogs passed. The other thing was that he started trying to sleep in my bed again. We started catching him again in the bedroom - always on my side, snuggled down, looking so content - it concerned me because it meant he preferred being in dark and quiet more than being on my lap, and I thought that might be a sign of... oh, I dunno... something... but I still don't think he slunk off and died. He wasn't sick. He was in fine form and spirits and appetite. I had been thinking of a way to make him an entirely indoor cat, but two things were stopping me: there was nowhere Stefan would tolerate a litter box, and Max loved being outside. He absolutely loved it. And since he never went far without Lucy, I thought we could go with this lifestyle for at least a couple of more years.
But Gray Max is gone now. The day after he disappeared, I walked along all the surrounding streets to make sure he wasn't on the side of one, hit by a car. I've posted flyers all over the neighborhood. I've posted online. I've registered with the local animal shelter's lost and found. But Gray Max has not been found.
My guess is that another animal got him - a raccoon or even a coyote. I just wish we could have found the body. And I hate the idea of him dying somewhere, alone, cold and in pain.
I miss Gray Max on my lap, or snuggled up against me on the couch. Or next to me in the yard. I miss his howl of demand to open the door to go out or come in. I miss his look of frustrated as Lucinda stood over him barking. I miss him beyond anything I can put into words. I think Lucinda misses him too.
Labels:
cat,
family,
Forest Grove,
kitty,
lost,
missing,
Oregon,
Washington County
Wednesday, November 7, 2018
Embrace the words that describe you
I embrace words that accurately describe me, even if they may not be said in a way that is complimentary. These words include activist, dissenter, feminist and cantankerous. I cannot deny that they are accurate, because I know what words mean.
Am I a socialist? Well, if socialism is passionately supporting public education, social security, affordable health care access for all people, taxing the rich at rates greater than the poor are taxed, public lands (city parks, national parks, national monuments, etc.), and taxes paying for social and public services then, yes, I am part socialist, because there are aspects of socialism I want in the USA. However, I also want people to be free to invest money and make money, to own their own houses and their own property, to become wealthy, to buy luxury items, to buy things they want but may not need - and a socialist, nor a communist, would be down with any of that. Karl Marx said, "The theory of Communism may be summed up in the single sentence: Abolition of private property." And I own a house and I love my house and it's mine, and I love my motorcycle and really don't want anyone else riding it EVER...
But, still, if I'm willing to accept the word socialism as a word that accurately describes of some of my beliefs, no matter how incendiary it is to some people, then why do people who are racists refuse to accept the description that they are racists? Racism is the belief that members of a category of people - a category based on their ancestry, their ethnicity - possess behavioral characteristics and intellectual abilities specific to that category, that race, especially so as to distinguish people of that race as inferior or superior to people of another race or races.
That means that if you think most people who are Latino, because of their biology, have a predisposition to rape and kill greater than people who are of European descent, you are a racist. If you believe that the biology of people from Asia makes them predisposed to be smarter than people who are black from Sub-Sahara Africa, you are a racist. If you think black Americans are predisposed to commit crimes at a much greater rate than whites because of their brain makeup, you are a racist. If you believe culture comes not from external factors and history but, rather, a person's biological makeup, then you are a racist.
By this accurate definition, Donald Trump is a racist, as are his supporters. There's no getting around that. based on his frequently stated beliefs and the crowds that cheer those statements. By calling Trump supporters racists, yes, I am insulting Trump supporters - but I'm also being accurate.
The list of Trump's racist remarks is too long for this blog. But here are just some highlights:
Trump characterizes cities with a large black population as dystopian war zones. In a 2016 debate with Hillary Clinton, Trump said, “Our inner cities, African Americans, Hispanics are living in hell because it’s so dangerous. You walk down the street, you get shot.” Trump also said to black voters: “You’re living in poverty; your schools are no good; you have no jobs.” Trump frequently offers false crime statistics to exaggerate urban crime in cities with large black populations, including about Oakland, Philadelphia and Ferguson, Missouri. This comes from his racist belief that black people are more violent than people of other races.
Trump frequently talks about crimes committed by dark-skinned people, sometimes exaggerating or lying about them (such as a claim about growing crime from “radical Islamic terror” in Britain). Again, this comes from his racist belief that people who are identified as not white are more prone to violence.
Trump is very slow to decry hate crimes committed by whites against dark-skinned people (such as the killing of an Indian man in Kansas last year). Trump called some of those who marched alongside white supremacists in Charlottesville, Va., last August “very fine people.” This comes from his racist belief that white violence against other races is somehow justified, or not as bad as violence by people from other races.
Trump said a federal judge hearing a case about Trump University was biased because of the judge’s Mexican heritage. This illustrates his racist belief that people of Hispanic or Latino descent are inferior in their abilities to white people.
In June 2017, Trump said 15,000 recent immigrants from Haiti “all have AIDS” and that 40,000 Nigerians, once seeing the United States, would never “go back to their huts” in Africa. Do I even have to explain what makes this racist?
At the White House, Trump vulgarly called for less immigration from Haiti and Africa and more from Norway, because he believes people from Scandinavia - white people - are superior to other races because of their biology.
His favorite insult of black Americans seems to be that they have a "low I.Q." or are not "smart": he's used this insult for Don Lemon, LeBron James, Maxine Waters. By contrast, he likes to use sexist remarks to insult white women, and insults about character and appearance for white men.
In the 1990s, Trump took out advertisements alleging that the “Mohawk Indian record of criminal activity is well documented.”
Trump once referred to a Hispanic Miss Universe as “Miss Housekeeping.”
Those are just some of the racist remarks he's made. If words have meaning, then Donald Trump is a racist. Why doesn't he embrace the title? He almost has: he's now admitted to being a nationalist, which is an extremist form of patriotism and is a term beloved among fascists. And fascism is inextricably tied with racism - the two cannot be separated.
Trump's domestic and foreign policies are based on two things: increasing his family's wealth and promoting his racist ideology. So, if you support him, there is only one thing to call you: racist. Why not embrace it? The description CANNOT be wrong unless you also believe your ideology about race is wrong. Period.
There is no denying that the US, like most countries on Earth, was built on racist ideologies. It is my choice every day, not just on election day, to embrace that or to fight against that continuing. Regardless of the election results, I'm going to continue to fight. I won't be "coming together" with racists. I won't be "looking for common ground" with racists. If it makes you uncomfortable when I speak out or walk out - it should, and that's your problem, not mine.
Not ready to make nice, not ready to back down...
Am I a socialist? Well, if socialism is passionately supporting public education, social security, affordable health care access for all people, taxing the rich at rates greater than the poor are taxed, public lands (city parks, national parks, national monuments, etc.), and taxes paying for social and public services then, yes, I am part socialist, because there are aspects of socialism I want in the USA. However, I also want people to be free to invest money and make money, to own their own houses and their own property, to become wealthy, to buy luxury items, to buy things they want but may not need - and a socialist, nor a communist, would be down with any of that. Karl Marx said, "The theory of Communism may be summed up in the single sentence: Abolition of private property." And I own a house and I love my house and it's mine, and I love my motorcycle and really don't want anyone else riding it EVER...
But, still, if I'm willing to accept the word socialism as a word that accurately describes of some of my beliefs, no matter how incendiary it is to some people, then why do people who are racists refuse to accept the description that they are racists? Racism is the belief that members of a category of people - a category based on their ancestry, their ethnicity - possess behavioral characteristics and intellectual abilities specific to that category, that race, especially so as to distinguish people of that race as inferior or superior to people of another race or races.
That means that if you think most people who are Latino, because of their biology, have a predisposition to rape and kill greater than people who are of European descent, you are a racist. If you believe that the biology of people from Asia makes them predisposed to be smarter than people who are black from Sub-Sahara Africa, you are a racist. If you think black Americans are predisposed to commit crimes at a much greater rate than whites because of their brain makeup, you are a racist. If you believe culture comes not from external factors and history but, rather, a person's biological makeup, then you are a racist.
By this accurate definition, Donald Trump is a racist, as are his supporters. There's no getting around that. based on his frequently stated beliefs and the crowds that cheer those statements. By calling Trump supporters racists, yes, I am insulting Trump supporters - but I'm also being accurate.
The list of Trump's racist remarks is too long for this blog. But here are just some highlights:
Trump characterizes cities with a large black population as dystopian war zones. In a 2016 debate with Hillary Clinton, Trump said, “Our inner cities, African Americans, Hispanics are living in hell because it’s so dangerous. You walk down the street, you get shot.” Trump also said to black voters: “You’re living in poverty; your schools are no good; you have no jobs.” Trump frequently offers false crime statistics to exaggerate urban crime in cities with large black populations, including about Oakland, Philadelphia and Ferguson, Missouri. This comes from his racist belief that black people are more violent than people of other races.
Trump frequently talks about crimes committed by dark-skinned people, sometimes exaggerating or lying about them (such as a claim about growing crime from “radical Islamic terror” in Britain). Again, this comes from his racist belief that people who are identified as not white are more prone to violence.
Trump is very slow to decry hate crimes committed by whites against dark-skinned people (such as the killing of an Indian man in Kansas last year). Trump called some of those who marched alongside white supremacists in Charlottesville, Va., last August “very fine people.” This comes from his racist belief that white violence against other races is somehow justified, or not as bad as violence by people from other races.
Trump said a federal judge hearing a case about Trump University was biased because of the judge’s Mexican heritage. This illustrates his racist belief that people of Hispanic or Latino descent are inferior in their abilities to white people.
In June 2017, Trump said 15,000 recent immigrants from Haiti “all have AIDS” and that 40,000 Nigerians, once seeing the United States, would never “go back to their huts” in Africa. Do I even have to explain what makes this racist?
At the White House, Trump vulgarly called for less immigration from Haiti and Africa and more from Norway, because he believes people from Scandinavia - white people - are superior to other races because of their biology.
His favorite insult of black Americans seems to be that they have a "low I.Q." or are not "smart": he's used this insult for Don Lemon, LeBron James, Maxine Waters. By contrast, he likes to use sexist remarks to insult white women, and insults about character and appearance for white men.
In the 1990s, Trump took out advertisements alleging that the “Mohawk Indian record of criminal activity is well documented.”
Trump once referred to a Hispanic Miss Universe as “Miss Housekeeping.”
Those are just some of the racist remarks he's made. If words have meaning, then Donald Trump is a racist. Why doesn't he embrace the title? He almost has: he's now admitted to being a nationalist, which is an extremist form of patriotism and is a term beloved among fascists. And fascism is inextricably tied with racism - the two cannot be separated.
Trump's domestic and foreign policies are based on two things: increasing his family's wealth and promoting his racist ideology. So, if you support him, there is only one thing to call you: racist. Why not embrace it? The description CANNOT be wrong unless you also believe your ideology about race is wrong. Period.
There is no denying that the US, like most countries on Earth, was built on racist ideologies. It is my choice every day, not just on election day, to embrace that or to fight against that continuing. Regardless of the election results, I'm going to continue to fight. I won't be "coming together" with racists. I won't be "looking for common ground" with racists. If it makes you uncomfortable when I speak out or walk out - it should, and that's your problem, not mine.
Not ready to make nice, not ready to back down...
Labels:
Democratic,
Democrats,
GOP,
labels,
Party,
Republicans
Tuesday, November 6, 2018
We did this. No matter what happens Nov. 6
When George W. Bush lost the popular vote but still became President, because the US Supreme Court prevented the vote recount in Florida, the outcry was barely a blip on the media radar. Millions were furious, but the press and even Al Gore said we needed to not protest, to, instead, just "come together" accept that a man the majority of voters did not vote for would be the leader of the USA. Anyone who continued to protest how the election was decided was branded a crank or un-American by the press and both parties. When the attacks on September 11, 2001 happened, criticizing the President became almost treasonous. When millions took to the streets to protest the second invasion of Iraq, the media downplayed the numbers and the fury, in order to not upset the President and lose their access. In 2004, when Bush won Ohio and Florida, again under mysterious circumstances and despite exit polls that said otherwise, any voiced opposition was, again, quickly dismissed as sore losers and unPatriotic.
What Republicans and the press didn't realize then is there was a great deal of resentment simmering under the perceived public quiet. We took that simmering resentment to the polls in 2008 in huge numbers and put Barack Obama in the White House for eight years, despite the gerrymandering, despite the voter suppression efforts.
In 2016, when Donald Trump lost the popular vote but still became President, and when a majority of Americans voted for Democrats in Congress but, because of gerrymandering, Republicans took both houses, something very different happened than in 2000: the majority didn't stay silent. Government and the media were taken aback when millions of women protested across the USA on or near January 21, 2017 to protest Donald Trump, the GOP and their attitudes and actions against women - in Portland, Oregon, there was a record-breaking number of people who took to the streets, and in protest-loving Portland, that's saying something. Government and media were shocked again when thousands of people spontaneously descended on airports across the USA to help Muslim visitors and Muslim green card holders who were suddenly in security limbo because of Trump's ban on Muslims.
The GOP and the mainstream media had anticipated and planned a different narrative. That's why NBC gave a morning TV show in 2017 to Fox News personality Megan Kelly, and ABC tried to revive the TV show Roseanne soon after - the media wanted to try to appeal to Trump supporters and expected the opposition to be silent. Networks were surprised when Kelly and Roseanne Barr's racism quickly surfaced, bias neither had ever tried to hide, and that the backlash was so very loud and swift that both shows were canceled.
All of this is a long-winded way of saying: your voice has made a difference. From individuals refusing to be silent at the Thanksgiving table as Uncle Racist spews his hate to attending public meetings with their elected officials in record numbers and being vocal about their demands to emailing and tweeting news outlets when they see attempts to sugar coat fascism to taking to the streets, you have kept the media on their toes and the Democratic Party leadership from compromising.
The resistance is real, it's made a difference, and individuals have fueled it - not George Soros, not the Democratic Party leadership, not official political groups and certainly not the media.
And you are exhausted. I know I am. I've been attending city council meetings and public meetings with state and local legislators, mostly just observing, listening to questions and comments, making sure extreme right-wingers aren't making any in-roads, making sure their rhetoric gets checked, and ready to throw a spotlight on anything that needs to be brought to everyone's attention, via social media - without an active, robust local press, we can't count on media coverage to keep an eye out. I've been registering voters, passing out League of Women Voters Oregon voter guides and trying to educate friends and neighbors about ballot measures. I've been attending debates by candidates for city and county offices. I've been trying to amplify media stories that my friends might have missed on social media. And I am so tired. And the thought of having to continue at this level, at 11, for another two years makes me want to give up.
So take a break on election day. And maybe the day of the election itself. Think about all that has been accomplished by individuals all across the USA who have refused to stay silent, who have protested in ways big and small. The media wouldn't be talking about the President lying if it wasn't for us. Late night talk show hosts wouldn't be talking about it either if it wasn't for us. The Democratic Party and Democrats in the Senate, the House and state legislatures all across the country wouldn't be resisting if it wasn't for us. We did this. Be proud of that, no matter what happens on November 6.
But also remember that this is a marathon, not a sprint. This is going to take more than one election to solve. The first public meeting of the Nazi party was in February 1920, when Adolf Hitler issued a "25 Point Program" outlining the party's political agenda - an agenda that embodied racism. Hitler was appointed German Chancellor in January 1933. It took less than 13 years for Nazism, the most well-known form of fascism, to take over German society completely. The end of the war ended Nazi control of Germany in 1945. That means it took 10 years to defeat Hitler. It took many more years to bring Nazi war criminals to justice. Are you ready for the long haul?
What Republicans and the press didn't realize then is there was a great deal of resentment simmering under the perceived public quiet. We took that simmering resentment to the polls in 2008 in huge numbers and put Barack Obama in the White House for eight years, despite the gerrymandering, despite the voter suppression efforts.
In 2016, when Donald Trump lost the popular vote but still became President, and when a majority of Americans voted for Democrats in Congress but, because of gerrymandering, Republicans took both houses, something very different happened than in 2000: the majority didn't stay silent. Government and the media were taken aback when millions of women protested across the USA on or near January 21, 2017 to protest Donald Trump, the GOP and their attitudes and actions against women - in Portland, Oregon, there was a record-breaking number of people who took to the streets, and in protest-loving Portland, that's saying something. Government and media were shocked again when thousands of people spontaneously descended on airports across the USA to help Muslim visitors and Muslim green card holders who were suddenly in security limbo because of Trump's ban on Muslims.
The GOP and the mainstream media had anticipated and planned a different narrative. That's why NBC gave a morning TV show in 2017 to Fox News personality Megan Kelly, and ABC tried to revive the TV show Roseanne soon after - the media wanted to try to appeal to Trump supporters and expected the opposition to be silent. Networks were surprised when Kelly and Roseanne Barr's racism quickly surfaced, bias neither had ever tried to hide, and that the backlash was so very loud and swift that both shows were canceled.
All of this is a long-winded way of saying: your voice has made a difference. From individuals refusing to be silent at the Thanksgiving table as Uncle Racist spews his hate to attending public meetings with their elected officials in record numbers and being vocal about their demands to emailing and tweeting news outlets when they see attempts to sugar coat fascism to taking to the streets, you have kept the media on their toes and the Democratic Party leadership from compromising.
The resistance is real, it's made a difference, and individuals have fueled it - not George Soros, not the Democratic Party leadership, not official political groups and certainly not the media.
And you are exhausted. I know I am. I've been attending city council meetings and public meetings with state and local legislators, mostly just observing, listening to questions and comments, making sure extreme right-wingers aren't making any in-roads, making sure their rhetoric gets checked, and ready to throw a spotlight on anything that needs to be brought to everyone's attention, via social media - without an active, robust local press, we can't count on media coverage to keep an eye out. I've been registering voters, passing out League of Women Voters Oregon voter guides and trying to educate friends and neighbors about ballot measures. I've been attending debates by candidates for city and county offices. I've been trying to amplify media stories that my friends might have missed on social media. And I am so tired. And the thought of having to continue at this level, at 11, for another two years makes me want to give up.
So take a break on election day. And maybe the day of the election itself. Think about all that has been accomplished by individuals all across the USA who have refused to stay silent, who have protested in ways big and small. The media wouldn't be talking about the President lying if it wasn't for us. Late night talk show hosts wouldn't be talking about it either if it wasn't for us. The Democratic Party and Democrats in the Senate, the House and state legislatures all across the country wouldn't be resisting if it wasn't for us. We did this. Be proud of that, no matter what happens on November 6.
But also remember that this is a marathon, not a sprint. This is going to take more than one election to solve. The first public meeting of the Nazi party was in February 1920, when Adolf Hitler issued a "25 Point Program" outlining the party's political agenda - an agenda that embodied racism. Hitler was appointed German Chancellor in January 1933. It took less than 13 years for Nazism, the most well-known form of fascism, to take over German society completely. The end of the war ended Nazi control of Germany in 1945. That means it took 10 years to defeat Hitler. It took many more years to bring Nazi war criminals to justice. Are you ready for the long haul?
Labels:
2018,
elections,
midterms,
resistance,
results
Saturday, November 3, 2018
Let's talk about Burt Reynolds instead of politics
I cried when Burt Reynolds died. I did. Movies and TV shows were my safe place growing up, and watching Reynolds host The Tonight Show was a happy time in my dysfunctional family. Going to the Starlight Drive-in in Henderson, Kentucky to see a Burt Reynolds movie was always a great time. I couldn't say that about Christmas with my family, but I could say that about any time a get together with my family and Burt Reynolds was involved.
Unless you were alive in the 1970s, you have NO IDEA how huge of a star he was in that decade. No idea. There is no celebrity I can compare his popularity to, before or since.
When I saw on Facebook soon after Reynolds died that a movie theater in Portland, Oregon was going to show Smokey and the Bandit, I immediately bought tickets for the showing, more than a month away. When am I ever going to get to see Smokey and the Bandit again on a big screen?! The showing was almost sold out and the audience laughed at all the right moments - except one, the one in which mocks Sheriff Buford T. Justice of Portague County for being a racist. I always appreciate that scene - the movie would have been disingenuous about the South without it. Regardless, I was in heaven watching that movie in a real theater, on the big screen. I could feel tears in my eyes when "Eastbound and Down" played the first time. A friend of mine tweeted after Burt died, "I was eight years old and my bike was, alternately, the Millennium Falcon and the Bandit’s black Trans-Am." And rewatching the movie reminded me of why that was.
Ever since that night in Portland, I've been hungry for more Burt Reynolds movies.
I'm thrilled to learn today that Turner Classic Movies will show six of his movies on December 26, including Smokey and the Bandit and The Longest Yard. But in October, TCM showed White Lightning, and I recorded it to watch when I had time. And I just watched it. Heaven.
White Lightning was a critical bomb, but an audience smash. If you are thinking of watching it, be forewarned: this is not the romantic, genteel South or the fun-loving good ole boy hick flick you may be expecting. This is not Smokey and the Bandit, though car chases abound. There are some beautiful, atmospheric moments and some hilariously-witty one-liners from Burt and, yes, he takes his shirt off a lot - which is FINE - but this a dark, gritty, at times brutal look at the rural South. If you can ignore the painfully stupid instrumental background music at times, and if you experienced any of the South in the 1970s, or if you wanted to, you'll dig this movie. I wore the clothes in this movie, women in my family had the hair of oh-so-many of the women in this movie... I swear, I could smell the grass, the cars, the food, the gasoline, the pigs, the sweat, the water - even the moonshine. I loved how all the women in this movie had normal, real bodies - no boob jobs, no botox, real hips. And when Burt says "The Poe-lease," I melt... that's how we talked growing up. I've been saying "The Poe-lease" frequently these days, much to the confusion of my German husband.
But White Lightning is more than just a movie that looks so nostalgic and atmospheric and has great car chases: I heard so many of the things said by the sheriff and some others in this movie when I was growing up by family members, neighbors, even teachers - about "hippies" and young college students daring to challenge the status quo, asking questions and asking, "Why?" I feel like the movie has a subversive, subtle message: the old ways are going away, and young people everywhere, all over the USA, including the South, are going to demand something much better: racial justice, women's equality, education for all. And you can't just kill them all or dismiss them as communists - they are going to just keep coming, and really, are they any better or worse than anyone else? The scene with Reynolds walking around the students in the diner, listening to them as they talk about justice, him obviously thinking of his brother and his ideals, really got me. I believe there are a lot of people like that in rural America, who may not be eloquent, who may be more focused on having a good time than trying to help the oppressed, but who admire those people we mock now as "social justice warriors."
I do wonder how modern audiences who don't know the VERY restrictive laws regarding alcohol in the USA once upon a time will understand the secondary plot of the movie, centering around the illegal production and transportation of whiskey, the massive amounts of money people made off such and the dogged attempts of the federal government to collect taxes on it.
It's not a movie for everyone. But if you have the right mindset, this is a good, thoughtful flick.
And on a side note, I found this interesting note from another reviewer:
Every character in this film hates the system! Sheriff Connors hates the Commies infiltrating Washington, the moonshiners hate the IRS, and those damn long-haired, pot smoking hippies are always protesting. This is because screenwriter William W. Norton was a rebel in his own right; a card-carrying member of the Communist Party since the paranoid 50’s, Norton’s life is as interesting as the story. After a career in Hollywood, penning THE SCALPHUNTERS, I DISMEMBER MAMA, BIG BAD MAMA, and this film’s sequel GATOR, he moved to Ireland in the 1980’s and became a gunrunner for the INLA (Irish National Liberation Army), until he and his wife Eleanor were busted in France, and sentenced to prison. After doing his time, and learning a warrant was issued in America, he sought asylum in Nicaragua, where he killed a man who broke into his house. Then he moved to Cuba, but found living under a Communist regime was a lot different from just carrying a card, so he fled to Mexico, eventually being smuggled back into the USA by friends, where he lived out his life.
And checking IMDB, I found out Norton's son directed an episode of Buffy the Vampire Slayer, one of my all-time favorite shows, and FreakyLinks, a show created by a friend of mine...
Mind. Blown.
Unless you were alive in the 1970s, you have NO IDEA how huge of a star he was in that decade. No idea. There is no celebrity I can compare his popularity to, before or since.
When I saw on Facebook soon after Reynolds died that a movie theater in Portland, Oregon was going to show Smokey and the Bandit, I immediately bought tickets for the showing, more than a month away. When am I ever going to get to see Smokey and the Bandit again on a big screen?! The showing was almost sold out and the audience laughed at all the right moments - except one, the one in which mocks Sheriff Buford T. Justice of Portague County for being a racist. I always appreciate that scene - the movie would have been disingenuous about the South without it. Regardless, I was in heaven watching that movie in a real theater, on the big screen. I could feel tears in my eyes when "Eastbound and Down" played the first time. A friend of mine tweeted after Burt died, "I was eight years old and my bike was, alternately, the Millennium Falcon and the Bandit’s black Trans-Am." And rewatching the movie reminded me of why that was.
Ever since that night in Portland, I've been hungry for more Burt Reynolds movies.
I'm thrilled to learn today that Turner Classic Movies will show six of his movies on December 26, including Smokey and the Bandit and The Longest Yard. But in October, TCM showed White Lightning, and I recorded it to watch when I had time. And I just watched it. Heaven.
White Lightning was a critical bomb, but an audience smash. If you are thinking of watching it, be forewarned: this is not the romantic, genteel South or the fun-loving good ole boy hick flick you may be expecting. This is not Smokey and the Bandit, though car chases abound. There are some beautiful, atmospheric moments and some hilariously-witty one-liners from Burt and, yes, he takes his shirt off a lot - which is FINE - but this a dark, gritty, at times brutal look at the rural South. If you can ignore the painfully stupid instrumental background music at times, and if you experienced any of the South in the 1970s, or if you wanted to, you'll dig this movie. I wore the clothes in this movie, women in my family had the hair of oh-so-many of the women in this movie... I swear, I could smell the grass, the cars, the food, the gasoline, the pigs, the sweat, the water - even the moonshine. I loved how all the women in this movie had normal, real bodies - no boob jobs, no botox, real hips. And when Burt says "The Poe-lease," I melt... that's how we talked growing up. I've been saying "The Poe-lease" frequently these days, much to the confusion of my German husband.
But White Lightning is more than just a movie that looks so nostalgic and atmospheric and has great car chases: I heard so many of the things said by the sheriff and some others in this movie when I was growing up by family members, neighbors, even teachers - about "hippies" and young college students daring to challenge the status quo, asking questions and asking, "Why?" I feel like the movie has a subversive, subtle message: the old ways are going away, and young people everywhere, all over the USA, including the South, are going to demand something much better: racial justice, women's equality, education for all. And you can't just kill them all or dismiss them as communists - they are going to just keep coming, and really, are they any better or worse than anyone else? The scene with Reynolds walking around the students in the diner, listening to them as they talk about justice, him obviously thinking of his brother and his ideals, really got me. I believe there are a lot of people like that in rural America, who may not be eloquent, who may be more focused on having a good time than trying to help the oppressed, but who admire those people we mock now as "social justice warriors."
I do wonder how modern audiences who don't know the VERY restrictive laws regarding alcohol in the USA once upon a time will understand the secondary plot of the movie, centering around the illegal production and transportation of whiskey, the massive amounts of money people made off such and the dogged attempts of the federal government to collect taxes on it.
It's not a movie for everyone. But if you have the right mindset, this is a good, thoughtful flick.
And on a side note, I found this interesting note from another reviewer:
Every character in this film hates the system! Sheriff Connors hates the Commies infiltrating Washington, the moonshiners hate the IRS, and those damn long-haired, pot smoking hippies are always protesting. This is because screenwriter William W. Norton was a rebel in his own right; a card-carrying member of the Communist Party since the paranoid 50’s, Norton’s life is as interesting as the story. After a career in Hollywood, penning THE SCALPHUNTERS, I DISMEMBER MAMA, BIG BAD MAMA, and this film’s sequel GATOR, he moved to Ireland in the 1980’s and became a gunrunner for the INLA (Irish National Liberation Army), until he and his wife Eleanor were busted in France, and sentenced to prison. After doing his time, and learning a warrant was issued in America, he sought asylum in Nicaragua, where he killed a man who broke into his house. Then he moved to Cuba, but found living under a Communist regime was a lot different from just carrying a card, so he fled to Mexico, eventually being smuggled back into the USA by friends, where he lived out his life.
And checking IMDB, I found out Norton's son directed an episode of Buffy the Vampire Slayer, one of my all-time favorite shows, and FreakyLinks, a show created by a friend of mine...
Mind. Blown.
Wednesday, October 31, 2018
Gilda & the Spanish Civil War
I love that Turner Classic Movies doesn't just show classic old movies. I love the classic old movies, I do. But TCM also shows obscure movies and documentaries that aren't shown on other channels, and I love those too.
Several days ago, they showed Gilda Live, Gilda Radner's Broadway show, filmed in September 1979. It includes most of the characters she made famous on Saturday Night Live: Emily Litella, rocker Candy Slice, Jewish gal of privilege Rhonda Weiss, Judy Miller (the energetic little girl with the big imagination who puts on "The Judy Miller" in her bedroom), and, of course, personal advice expert Roseanne Roseannadanna. It also features Don Novello as Father Guido Sarducci.
I saw this several times back in 1980 or so, when it was shown on one of the movie channels like HBO that, back then, showed movies. I must have seen it a dozen times back then, and I was thrilled that it was still so funny to me now... but maybe only to those that love Gilda Radner like I do and know these characters so well.
Radner was SO talented - the amount of energy she puts into every performance is astounding. She was one of my idols when I was a pre-teen - I wanted to be as funny and talented as her, but I never dared to really go for it the way she did. I always held back. I ended up crying through the last song: "Baby, Kiss Me... With Your Clothes On." It's so sweet. SNL was one of those sanctuary activities when I was a kid, providing a safe space for the madness all around. If it weren't for shows like this and weekends at my grandparents', I wouldn't ever get nostalgic about childhood. I sure miss her.
Several weeks before this, TCM showed, The Spanish Soil, a 1937 documentary/propaganda piece showing the struggle of Spanish Loyalists - also known as Republican - that supported the established government against the rebellion by ultra-right-wing forces led by General Francisco Franco, which was backed by Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy. The short film was meant not only to show the bravery of the Spanish people, but also to how the Fascist forces were disrupting the simple lives of a small village just trying to irrigate a field. The film was produced by the Contemporary Historians production company, formed by theatrical producer and director Herman Shumlin, writer Lillian Hellman and poet, writer, critic, and satirist Dorothy Parker. The English narration was written by John Dos Passos and Ernest Hemingway, and originally, the film was narrated by Orson Welles - his narration for this film represents the very first professional film work of Welles, then a theatre and radio celebrity in his early twenties.
I love being able to actually see pre-World War II propaganda, rather than just reading about it. My sympathies have always firmly been with the Spanish Loyalists and the Abraham Lincoln Brigade, and I admit to finding myself stirred by the passion of the filmmakers to get this message out - though the film isn't so great. Still, wasn't at all wasted time. Learning history never is.
And so, in summary: I love movies.
Several days ago, they showed Gilda Live, Gilda Radner's Broadway show, filmed in September 1979. It includes most of the characters she made famous on Saturday Night Live: Emily Litella, rocker Candy Slice, Jewish gal of privilege Rhonda Weiss, Judy Miller (the energetic little girl with the big imagination who puts on "The Judy Miller" in her bedroom), and, of course, personal advice expert Roseanne Roseannadanna. It also features Don Novello as Father Guido Sarducci.
I saw this several times back in 1980 or so, when it was shown on one of the movie channels like HBO that, back then, showed movies. I must have seen it a dozen times back then, and I was thrilled that it was still so funny to me now... but maybe only to those that love Gilda Radner like I do and know these characters so well.
Radner was SO talented - the amount of energy she puts into every performance is astounding. She was one of my idols when I was a pre-teen - I wanted to be as funny and talented as her, but I never dared to really go for it the way she did. I always held back. I ended up crying through the last song: "Baby, Kiss Me... With Your Clothes On." It's so sweet. SNL was one of those sanctuary activities when I was a kid, providing a safe space for the madness all around. If it weren't for shows like this and weekends at my grandparents', I wouldn't ever get nostalgic about childhood. I sure miss her.
Several weeks before this, TCM showed, The Spanish Soil, a 1937 documentary/propaganda piece showing the struggle of Spanish Loyalists - also known as Republican - that supported the established government against the rebellion by ultra-right-wing forces led by General Francisco Franco, which was backed by Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy. The short film was meant not only to show the bravery of the Spanish people, but also to how the Fascist forces were disrupting the simple lives of a small village just trying to irrigate a field. The film was produced by the Contemporary Historians production company, formed by theatrical producer and director Herman Shumlin, writer Lillian Hellman and poet, writer, critic, and satirist Dorothy Parker. The English narration was written by John Dos Passos and Ernest Hemingway, and originally, the film was narrated by Orson Welles - his narration for this film represents the very first professional film work of Welles, then a theatre and radio celebrity in his early twenties.
I love being able to actually see pre-World War II propaganda, rather than just reading about it. My sympathies have always firmly been with the Spanish Loyalists and the Abraham Lincoln Brigade, and I admit to finding myself stirred by the passion of the filmmakers to get this message out - though the film isn't so great. Still, wasn't at all wasted time. Learning history never is.
And so, in summary: I love movies.
Monday, October 29, 2018
Precious buttercups at Halloween
Halloween used to be my favorite holiday.
I loved putting together a costume using nothing but the family closets and my Mom's makeup. I loved seeing what the other kids wore. I loved all the different ways neighbors celebrated, some with incredible decorations and some with homemade treats. I loved how some neighbors tried to be scary and some tried to be fun but pretty much everyone participated - and if they didn't, they just left their porch light off and there were no hard feelings. I loved the Halloween parties. When I got older, I still loved Halloween: I loved being the neighbor who dressed up, who delighted in the kids coming to my door in costume, whether they were little children or teens, and who never ran out of candy. And I still loved the parties.
I'm giving up on Halloween. The last five years have worn me down. I'm tired of opening the door to a bored adult standing there with a sack and saying, "Yeah, my kid's sick, I'm putting together his candy sack." Or a group of teens with no costumes, who won't even bother to say "Trick or Treat," holding out their hands or a baseball cap. I'm tired of the endless memes telling me what kind of candy to hand out, or not to hand out candy at all, to hand out toys or toothbrushes instead. Or not to hand out anything orange (yes, this was a request on an online group for my local community - someone's precious buttercup doesn't like any candy wrapped in orange paper). Oh, and don't be too scary! It scares my kid! And I'm tired of being told that any expectation of costumes or "Trick or Treat" is me being unreasonable - one person said I deserved to have my house egged as a result.
So, this Halloween, our porch light will be off. Enough.
Boo.
I am now the Grinch of Halloween.
I loved putting together a costume using nothing but the family closets and my Mom's makeup. I loved seeing what the other kids wore. I loved all the different ways neighbors celebrated, some with incredible decorations and some with homemade treats. I loved how some neighbors tried to be scary and some tried to be fun but pretty much everyone participated - and if they didn't, they just left their porch light off and there were no hard feelings. I loved the Halloween parties. When I got older, I still loved Halloween: I loved being the neighbor who dressed up, who delighted in the kids coming to my door in costume, whether they were little children or teens, and who never ran out of candy. And I still loved the parties.
I'm giving up on Halloween. The last five years have worn me down. I'm tired of opening the door to a bored adult standing there with a sack and saying, "Yeah, my kid's sick, I'm putting together his candy sack." Or a group of teens with no costumes, who won't even bother to say "Trick or Treat," holding out their hands or a baseball cap. I'm tired of the endless memes telling me what kind of candy to hand out, or not to hand out candy at all, to hand out toys or toothbrushes instead. Or not to hand out anything orange (yes, this was a request on an online group for my local community - someone's precious buttercup doesn't like any candy wrapped in orange paper). Oh, and don't be too scary! It scares my kid! And I'm tired of being told that any expectation of costumes or "Trick or Treat" is me being unreasonable - one person said I deserved to have my house egged as a result.
So, this Halloween, our porch light will be off. Enough.
Boo.
I am now the Grinch of Halloween.
Thursday, October 18, 2018
Living the consequences of Nov 2016 elections, dreading Nov 2018
In December 2016, I was told, "It doesn't matter to the average person who is President. It doesn't really affect everyday people."
In response, I said parents would be ripped away from their children because of the election. I said people would start losing their health care and some would die as a consequence. I said public lands would start shrinking and environmental protections would be radically rolled back.
As I said in a blog back in 2016 after that night, that smirking person said:
I was being "alarmist" and "overly-dramatic" regarding Trump and his supporters, that it's not "that bad", that I should be more tolerant and caring regarding his supporters, some of whom are my neighbors, that they aren't "bad" people, that being polite and listening to them would be good for me...
My pushback against this person made observers uncomfortable. I ended up losing some people I considered friends because I dared to talk openly after that night about the horror show that quickly unfolded after January: the ban on Muslim immigrants, the canceling of green card status for people who have lived and worked here for many years, the scaling back of the affordable care act and the taking away of health care coverage from thousands (soon millions), the flat wages while prices rise, the layoffs of thousands of people and closing of businesses, the scaling back of public lands, the elimination of various environmental protections, the elimination of protections for home buyers and people with student debt, Nazis proudly marching in the streets of the USA, emboldened and empowered by the President, the President's open adoration of violent regimes (Russia, Saudi Arabia, North Korean, etc.), the separation of children and their families at the borders, the internment camps for immigrants, and, of course, the rich getting oh-so-richer while critically-needed safety net programs were eliminated.
So, yeah, I was right about the consequences of election night - in fact, I underestimated the consequences. But I take no pleasure in being right about it. None. I would have loved to have been wrong.
I didn't really think about then was how the Presidency would affect me, personally, so quickly: two much-needed jobs in the pipeline completely disappeared within weeks of the election because of anticipated federal budget cuts. Former clients have greatly scaled back because of federal cuts. We're holding our breath over a quickly-approaching green card renewal as we read horror stories of denials.
When I say elections are going to have dire consequences and affect real people, I'm not imagining things nor exaggerating. All of this affects real people, and if it hasn't affected you, then you are privileged.
It's not enough to vote in November - ask neighbors if they are registered. Ask them if they need a voter guide from the League of Women Voters (your state has them online). Ask them if they know where their polling place is. Ask your college-student sons and daughters' friends the same.
Also see Silence means approval
In response, I said parents would be ripped away from their children because of the election. I said people would start losing their health care and some would die as a consequence. I said public lands would start shrinking and environmental protections would be radically rolled back.
As I said in a blog back in 2016 after that night, that smirking person said:
I was being "alarmist" and "overly-dramatic" regarding Trump and his supporters, that it's not "that bad", that I should be more tolerant and caring regarding his supporters, some of whom are my neighbors, that they aren't "bad" people, that being polite and listening to them would be good for me...
My pushback against this person made observers uncomfortable. I ended up losing some people I considered friends because I dared to talk openly after that night about the horror show that quickly unfolded after January: the ban on Muslim immigrants, the canceling of green card status for people who have lived and worked here for many years, the scaling back of the affordable care act and the taking away of health care coverage from thousands (soon millions), the flat wages while prices rise, the layoffs of thousands of people and closing of businesses, the scaling back of public lands, the elimination of various environmental protections, the elimination of protections for home buyers and people with student debt, Nazis proudly marching in the streets of the USA, emboldened and empowered by the President, the President's open adoration of violent regimes (Russia, Saudi Arabia, North Korean, etc.), the separation of children and their families at the borders, the internment camps for immigrants, and, of course, the rich getting oh-so-richer while critically-needed safety net programs were eliminated.
So, yeah, I was right about the consequences of election night - in fact, I underestimated the consequences. But I take no pleasure in being right about it. None. I would have loved to have been wrong.
I didn't really think about then was how the Presidency would affect me, personally, so quickly: two much-needed jobs in the pipeline completely disappeared within weeks of the election because of anticipated federal budget cuts. Former clients have greatly scaled back because of federal cuts. We're holding our breath over a quickly-approaching green card renewal as we read horror stories of denials.
When I say elections are going to have dire consequences and affect real people, I'm not imagining things nor exaggerating. All of this affects real people, and if it hasn't affected you, then you are privileged.
It's not enough to vote in November - ask neighbors if they are registered. Ask them if they need a voter guide from the League of Women Voters (your state has them online). Ask them if they know where their polling place is. Ask your college-student sons and daughters' friends the same.
Also see Silence means approval
Tuesday, October 16, 2018
Washington County Sheriff and District Attorney both oppose Measure 105 in Oregon
On Wednesday, August 08, 2018, Kevin Barton, Washington County District Attorney, and Pat Garrett, Washington County Sheriff, had their joint statement in opposition to Oregon Measure 105 published in various newspapers in the Portland, Oregon metro area. These newspapers require registration to read their statement online, and while registration is free, the registration step turns a lot of readers away. So below is the statement in full. One of the points the sheriff makes repeatedly, and rightly so, is that the current law (ORS 181A.820) provides no sanctuary to an undocumented immigrant who commits a crime in Oregon.
As district attorney and sheriff, we are the elected law enforcement leaders in Washington County. One of our primary obligations is to ensure public safety. We believe every member of our community has the right to live, work and raise a family in safety and that an essential aspect of being safe is feeling safe and having access to justice.
Through our role as public safety leaders, we are aware of Ballot Measure 105 (formerly known as Initiative Petition 22). This measure seeks to repeal ORS 181A.820, a 31-year-old Oregon law that controls when local law enforcement agencies may use local resources to enforce federal immigration laws. We are compelled to speak because we believe this ballot measure may negatively impact public safety.
Oregon's Legislature passed ORS 181A.820 in 1987 to provide structure regarding how and when local police can be involved in enforcing federal immigration law. This longstanding law states local police cannot use resources to detect or apprehend persons whose only law violation is federal immigration law. Importantly, this law does not prohibit local police from using resources to detect, apprehend or even cooperate with immigration officials for people who have violated federal immigration law and committed a crime. In other words, the current law (ORS 181A.820) provides no sanctuary to an undocumented immigrant who commits a crime in Oregon. In fact, it specifically authorizes police to share information with federal immigration authorities.
ORS 181A.820 strikes the right balance. Under this law local police cannot enforce federal immigration laws but can cooperate and communicate with immigration authorities if an undocumented immigrant commits a crime. While there are certainly ways the current law could be improved or clarified, and there appears to be some misunderstanding regarding how this law works, repealing it altogether is not the answer.
A repeal of ORS 181A.820 would likely create a chilling effect in our community. Certain members of the immigrant population may be less likely to report crimes, to access justice services such as restraining orders, or to even appear in court and testify as witnesses. Immigrant communities and families may become greater targets for criminals because they may be less likely to come forward or appear in court to testify. These are not hypothetical concerns; we have already seen these issues occur. If ORS 181A.820 is repealed, we believe these problems may increase.
Additionally, a repeal of the current uniform law that allows all law enforcement throughout Oregon to communicate with immigration authorities regarding criminal defendants would likely result in a patchwork of inconsistent ordinances and rules from various cities and counties.
Our community is safer when citizens and non-citizens alike report crimes and testify in court so we can arrest and prosecute criminals. We believe that ORS 181A.820 strikes the right balance to keep our community safe and we oppose the effort to repeal it.
Kevin Barton, Washington County District Attorney, and Pat Garrett, Washington County Sheriff.
As district attorney and sheriff, we are the elected law enforcement leaders in Washington County. One of our primary obligations is to ensure public safety. We believe every member of our community has the right to live, work and raise a family in safety and that an essential aspect of being safe is feeling safe and having access to justice.
Through our role as public safety leaders, we are aware of Ballot Measure 105 (formerly known as Initiative Petition 22). This measure seeks to repeal ORS 181A.820, a 31-year-old Oregon law that controls when local law enforcement agencies may use local resources to enforce federal immigration laws. We are compelled to speak because we believe this ballot measure may negatively impact public safety.
Oregon's Legislature passed ORS 181A.820 in 1987 to provide structure regarding how and when local police can be involved in enforcing federal immigration law. This longstanding law states local police cannot use resources to detect or apprehend persons whose only law violation is federal immigration law. Importantly, this law does not prohibit local police from using resources to detect, apprehend or even cooperate with immigration officials for people who have violated federal immigration law and committed a crime. In other words, the current law (ORS 181A.820) provides no sanctuary to an undocumented immigrant who commits a crime in Oregon. In fact, it specifically authorizes police to share information with federal immigration authorities.
ORS 181A.820 strikes the right balance. Under this law local police cannot enforce federal immigration laws but can cooperate and communicate with immigration authorities if an undocumented immigrant commits a crime. While there are certainly ways the current law could be improved or clarified, and there appears to be some misunderstanding regarding how this law works, repealing it altogether is not the answer.
A repeal of ORS 181A.820 would likely create a chilling effect in our community. Certain members of the immigrant population may be less likely to report crimes, to access justice services such as restraining orders, or to even appear in court and testify as witnesses. Immigrant communities and families may become greater targets for criminals because they may be less likely to come forward or appear in court to testify. These are not hypothetical concerns; we have already seen these issues occur. If ORS 181A.820 is repealed, we believe these problems may increase.
Additionally, a repeal of the current uniform law that allows all law enforcement throughout Oregon to communicate with immigration authorities regarding criminal defendants would likely result in a patchwork of inconsistent ordinances and rules from various cities and counties.
Our community is safer when citizens and non-citizens alike report crimes and testify in court so we can arrest and prosecute criminals. We believe that ORS 181A.820 strikes the right balance to keep our community safe and we oppose the effort to repeal it.
Kevin Barton, Washington County District Attorney, and Pat Garrett, Washington County Sheriff.
Friday, October 12, 2018
Why listening to candidates is so imporant
There are two people running for the office that heads our county government here in Oregon. One of them
I've learned all of this by attending two forums - newspaper stories and his website make him appear relatively sensible, if just center-right politically.
I have a feeling most of the people that want to support this person don't realize what they are voting for.
Pay attention to your local races, folks. MAKE time to hear these people speak. I have a feeling most of the people that want to support this person don't realize what they are voting for.
- doesn't believe libraries should do anything but lend books and videos (he has a big problem with "all these language classes and other stuff they offer now"),
- believes there aren't any homeless or mental illness problems in our county that nonprofits and churches aren't "handling",
- believes our county's affordable housing crisis will be solved by tax breaks for private companies, and
- believes that the way to handle traffic congestion is to build more roads and synchronize traffic lights.
I've learned all of this by attending two forums - newspaper stories and his website make him appear relatively sensible, if just center-right politically.
I have a feeling most of the people that want to support this person don't realize what they are voting for.
Pay attention to your local races, folks. MAKE time to hear these people speak. I have a feeling most of the people that want to support this person don't realize what they are voting for.
Tuesday, October 9, 2018
30 years ago - 1988
Jeepers. It just dawned on me that, 30 years ago, I graduated from Western Kentucky University, worked my first summer at the Williamstown Theater Festival and then started as a PR assistant at Hartford Stage in Hartford, Connecticut, which had just opened A Midsummer Night's Dream, directed by Mark Lamos and which featured a very young and often shirtless Bradley Whitford. And I was a size 8.
It was an extraordinary year. I loved my senior year of college and I loved my first post-university jobs. I felt like the luckiest girl alive.
What a year it was (links go to photos):
Good times!
Many of the people I knew in that year, and met in that year, are my still friends to this day.
30 years ago? Sometimes it seems like a million, sometimes it seems like yesterday.
It was an extraordinary year. I loved my senior year of college and I loved my first post-university jobs. I felt like the luckiest girl alive.
What a year it was (links go to photos):
- I wrung in the new year outside of London with my best friend from WKU, Carmen, and my new best friend from the UK, Louise.
- In the Spring, I was part of the first massive protest that my university had seen in more than a decade - students protested the WKU President, Kern Alexander, install faculty editors at the WKU student newspaper, the College Heights Herald, and the WKU yearbook, the Talisman.
- In May, I graduated, stuck around town for a month with friends, then closed my bank account in Bowling Green and moved away, not knowing that Domino's Pizza hadn't cashed my last check I wrote to them and they swore out a bench warrant for my arrest and my former flatmate, still in town for the summer theater, had to take care of it.
- I drove from Kentucky to New England and back to Kentucky twice, having never seen much of the USA at all until then.
- Over the summer, I helped a fledgling little show called Entertainment Tonight get interviews at Williamstown, which they featured on TV for a full week.
- Sigourney Weaver said my name and Tony Goldwyn rocked his baby while doing a press interview in my office.
- I met Christopher Reeve and he hated me and two years later, he STILL hated me.
- Nikos Psacharopoulos would hang up on me if he called and I said my boss wasn't in the office.
- Jon Polito and I discussed both being Capricorns.
- I worked with possibly the most talented, dedicated, fun staff I ever have in my life - at Hartford Stage (though the staff at the UN my first two years run a very, very close second)
Good times!
Many of the people I knew in that year, and met in that year, are my still friends to this day.
30 years ago? Sometimes it seems like a million, sometimes it seems like yesterday.
Wednesday, October 3, 2018
A happy ending for Daisy Dog
Daisy the dog snarled and lunged at other dogs. She didn't play with toys. She wouldn't look at the other dog or the cats in her apartment. She avoided eye contact with humans. She looked anxious all the time. I was a bit scared of her.
Then I started walking her every day, along with the other dog in her apartment. My own dog, Albi, had died, and I wasn't quite ready to get a new dog, but I missed dogs, and her owner had trouble getting around. When I would arrive to walk Daisy, she would howl with delight. Sometimes I howled too. She started prancing when I walked her. A firm "OFF" at the first sign of a growl stopped her snarling and lunging at other dogs. After bringing her into my backyard just once, she veered towards my house every time I walked her, wanting to return - and stay. When I would walk her back to her apartment, she would fall behind me. Her reluctance to return was obvious.
After several months of this, her owner, my neighbor, died. There were five cats to find homes for, and two dogs - one of them Daisy. Four of the cats were adopted quickly. The other canine, a trained therapy dog, was quickly adopted as well. I took one of the cats, despite promising my husband once upon a time we would never have a cat. But he said no to Daisy: she looked too scary, she was overweight, she was older, people would avoid us when they saw us coming with her.
Other neighbors, with a house full of cats, said they would foster Daisy until they, or I, found a forever home for her, but after just a few months, they announced they were keeping her.
Daisy still howled whenever I arrived to walk her or just to visit. I stopped by once just to say hi with my new dog, Lucinda, on our way to the vet, and Daisy insisted on going with us. She had dog toys and she played with them. She started rolling in the yard on her back, doing that happy roll that most dogs do. She loved the pit bull, Bella, next door. She would fuss at Lucinda like a cranky, beloved aunt, and Lucy LOVED it. Daisy would come for a visit and lay on the back porch, just hanging out, surveying the yard, watching Lucy be crazy. Twice I caught my husband bent down rubbing the "scary" dog's belly. When one of the cats in Daisy's home had kittens, she patiently let them crawl all over her. She lay quietly as the pet rabbits hopped around her, a look of amazing contentment on her face. She enjoyed being cuddled.
Daisy lived for four years in a house where she was loved and adored. A house in stark contrast to where she had lived before. A house where there was no screaming or constant angry chaos. A house that was sometimes lively and loud with joy but more often quiet with love and contentment. And in October 2018, Daisy passed away quickly and peacefully in the home she loved and that loved her oh-so-much.
Love you always, Daisy Dog.
Then I started walking her every day, along with the other dog in her apartment. My own dog, Albi, had died, and I wasn't quite ready to get a new dog, but I missed dogs, and her owner had trouble getting around. When I would arrive to walk Daisy, she would howl with delight. Sometimes I howled too. She started prancing when I walked her. A firm "OFF" at the first sign of a growl stopped her snarling and lunging at other dogs. After bringing her into my backyard just once, she veered towards my house every time I walked her, wanting to return - and stay. When I would walk her back to her apartment, she would fall behind me. Her reluctance to return was obvious.
After several months of this, her owner, my neighbor, died. There were five cats to find homes for, and two dogs - one of them Daisy. Four of the cats were adopted quickly. The other canine, a trained therapy dog, was quickly adopted as well. I took one of the cats, despite promising my husband once upon a time we would never have a cat. But he said no to Daisy: she looked too scary, she was overweight, she was older, people would avoid us when they saw us coming with her.
Other neighbors, with a house full of cats, said they would foster Daisy until they, or I, found a forever home for her, but after just a few months, they announced they were keeping her.
Daisy still howled whenever I arrived to walk her or just to visit. I stopped by once just to say hi with my new dog, Lucinda, on our way to the vet, and Daisy insisted on going with us. She had dog toys and she played with them. She started rolling in the yard on her back, doing that happy roll that most dogs do. She loved the pit bull, Bella, next door. She would fuss at Lucinda like a cranky, beloved aunt, and Lucy LOVED it. Daisy would come for a visit and lay on the back porch, just hanging out, surveying the yard, watching Lucy be crazy. Twice I caught my husband bent down rubbing the "scary" dog's belly. When one of the cats in Daisy's home had kittens, she patiently let them crawl all over her. She lay quietly as the pet rabbits hopped around her, a look of amazing contentment on her face. She enjoyed being cuddled.
Daisy lived for four years in a house where she was loved and adored. A house in stark contrast to where she had lived before. A house where there was no screaming or constant angry chaos. A house that was sometimes lively and loud with joy but more often quiet with love and contentment. And in October 2018, Daisy passed away quickly and peacefully in the home she loved and that loved her oh-so-much.
Love you always, Daisy Dog.
Thursday, September 27, 2018
Oregon Measure 105
I try to attend every town hall in my area by my federal and state senators and representatives. I've asked a question only once, at my state representative's public meeting, mostly because there were just a dozen or so people there and I just kinda wanted to see what she would say. I usually already know all of the positions of my state and federal representatives. I'm at these town halls mostly to make sure Trump supporters don't highjack the meeting and make it seem like they are in the majority - they are not. There's usually someone standing at the entrance to the town hall with paper signs - one is green with "agree" on it and one is red with "disagree" on it. Display of the signs is how the speaker knows what the room is thinking.
I like to live tweet town halls I attend. I tweet about questions being asked and how the representative is responding. It's my way of reminding people that their representatives are (or should be) available to answer their questions in public and that people need to take advantage of opportunities to hear directly from their elected officials. My overall message: It's easy to be "involved," and this is what it looks like.
At a recent meeting I attended, one of the audience members said that she is a survivor of sexual violence: she said that, in 2001, she was raped for 15 hours by men in the USA illegally. She asked our Representative to change her mind and support Oregon Measure 105, which will repeal Oregon's Sanctuary State Law (ORS 181A.820). Repeal would mean local police and sheriff's deputies could ask people for proof of their immigration status and arrest people for violating federal immigration law, even if they aren't being investigated for such. The woman at the event believes that most illegal immigrants are criminals, that they commit far more violent crimes than other people, and that Measure 105 will protect people - and that it would have protected her.
Her horrific experience is something that deserves our empathy and sympathy and ANGER, no question. These men that did this are beyond evil. I hope they were prosecuted. In fact, I wish them nothing but pain. But I wish all of this not because they are illegal immigrants. I wish it because they did something reprehensible beyond measure. I would feel the same way had they been legal immigrants. I would feel the same way if they were citizens that were born in the USA. Their legal status as residents or citizens in no way changes the nature of the horror they inflicted.
So, if this survivor had been raped by people where legal immigrants, would she now want all legal immigrants banned? I guess she would say, "If people are willing to commit one crime - crossing the border and living here illegally - they will commit any crime." Never mind that such is not backed up by facts. Yes, there are illegal immigrants who commit violent crimes. There are FAR more natural born citizens who commit violent crimes.
And consider the actions of these immigrants:
William Ramirez, a father of two from Colombia, was on his way to his maintenance job at a boatyard when he witnessed a man trying to gun down a Miami police officer. Ramirez drove his van into the line of fire, shielding the policeman from the shooter and pulling him to safety.
Antonio Diaz Chacon, from Mexico, was in Albuquerque and saw a young girl being abducted off the street, and unhesitatingly pursued the kidnapper to rescue the child.
Jesus Manuel Cordova saved the life of a 9-year-old boy stranded in the Arizona desert. The boy’s mother had died in a car crash, leaving him helpless — until he was discovered by Cordova, who had just entered the country illegally. Cordova stayed with the boy, keeping watch for hours until someone eventually found them and contacted the authorities.
On the day of the Boston marathon bombing of 2013, Costa Rican Carlos Arredondo rushed to help the victims just after the explosion of the two bombs. He made a tourniquet for Jeff Bauman, a victim who lost both legs. His picture in a cowboy hat next to Bauman in a wheelchair circulated around the world.
José Gutierrez, the first American soldier killed in combat after the invasion of Iraq, on March 21, 2003, was an orphaned Guatemalan who had entered the U.S. at the age of 2.
Damián López RodrÃguez, a Mexican from Nogales, joined the USA military and he died on April 6, 2007, along with two other soldiers when their Humvee was hit by home-made bomb.
Some of the aforementioned were here legally, some came to the USA illegally. Can you tell which ones just by their actions? Would you really look at the people these immigrants saved or served and saved, "I don't care, I wish they had been deported and not helped you or your family"?
Fearing deportation, many domestic violence victims are steering clear of police and courts. Is that what we want, for people that commit domestic violence, many of them NOT immigrants, to get away with that crime because of fear of deportation? How does that keep us safer?
Immigrants are being scammed by NON immigrants but are reluctant to call police about the crime. How does that keep any of us safer?
When people commit crimes, they should be punished. When people prevent crimes or help people, they should be celebrated. What their immigration status is doesn't in any way make people more likely to be criminals nor heroes.
Washington County, Oregon District Attorney Kevin Barton and Washington County Sheriff Pat Garrett have issued a joint statement saying they do not want the repeal of Oregon Measure 105 and that "Our community is safer when citizens and non-citizens alike report crimes and testify in court so we can arrest and prosecute criminals." I agree.
I like to live tweet town halls I attend. I tweet about questions being asked and how the representative is responding. It's my way of reminding people that their representatives are (or should be) available to answer their questions in public and that people need to take advantage of opportunities to hear directly from their elected officials. My overall message: It's easy to be "involved," and this is what it looks like.
At a recent meeting I attended, one of the audience members said that she is a survivor of sexual violence: she said that, in 2001, she was raped for 15 hours by men in the USA illegally. She asked our Representative to change her mind and support Oregon Measure 105, which will repeal Oregon's Sanctuary State Law (ORS 181A.820). Repeal would mean local police and sheriff's deputies could ask people for proof of their immigration status and arrest people for violating federal immigration law, even if they aren't being investigated for such. The woman at the event believes that most illegal immigrants are criminals, that they commit far more violent crimes than other people, and that Measure 105 will protect people - and that it would have protected her.
Her horrific experience is something that deserves our empathy and sympathy and ANGER, no question. These men that did this are beyond evil. I hope they were prosecuted. In fact, I wish them nothing but pain. But I wish all of this not because they are illegal immigrants. I wish it because they did something reprehensible beyond measure. I would feel the same way had they been legal immigrants. I would feel the same way if they were citizens that were born in the USA. Their legal status as residents or citizens in no way changes the nature of the horror they inflicted.
So, if this survivor had been raped by people where legal immigrants, would she now want all legal immigrants banned? I guess she would say, "If people are willing to commit one crime - crossing the border and living here illegally - they will commit any crime." Never mind that such is not backed up by facts. Yes, there are illegal immigrants who commit violent crimes. There are FAR more natural born citizens who commit violent crimes.
And consider the actions of these immigrants:
William Ramirez, a father of two from Colombia, was on his way to his maintenance job at a boatyard when he witnessed a man trying to gun down a Miami police officer. Ramirez drove his van into the line of fire, shielding the policeman from the shooter and pulling him to safety.
Antonio Diaz Chacon, from Mexico, was in Albuquerque and saw a young girl being abducted off the street, and unhesitatingly pursued the kidnapper to rescue the child.
Jesus Manuel Cordova saved the life of a 9-year-old boy stranded in the Arizona desert. The boy’s mother had died in a car crash, leaving him helpless — until he was discovered by Cordova, who had just entered the country illegally. Cordova stayed with the boy, keeping watch for hours until someone eventually found them and contacted the authorities.
On the day of the Boston marathon bombing of 2013, Costa Rican Carlos Arredondo rushed to help the victims just after the explosion of the two bombs. He made a tourniquet for Jeff Bauman, a victim who lost both legs. His picture in a cowboy hat next to Bauman in a wheelchair circulated around the world.
José Gutierrez, the first American soldier killed in combat after the invasion of Iraq, on March 21, 2003, was an orphaned Guatemalan who had entered the U.S. at the age of 2.
Damián López RodrÃguez, a Mexican from Nogales, joined the USA military and he died on April 6, 2007, along with two other soldiers when their Humvee was hit by home-made bomb.
Some of the aforementioned were here legally, some came to the USA illegally. Can you tell which ones just by their actions? Would you really look at the people these immigrants saved or served and saved, "I don't care, I wish they had been deported and not helped you or your family"?
Fearing deportation, many domestic violence victims are steering clear of police and courts. Is that what we want, for people that commit domestic violence, many of them NOT immigrants, to get away with that crime because of fear of deportation? How does that keep us safer?
Immigrants are being scammed by NON immigrants but are reluctant to call police about the crime. How does that keep any of us safer?
When people commit crimes, they should be punished. When people prevent crimes or help people, they should be celebrated. What their immigration status is doesn't in any way make people more likely to be criminals nor heroes.
Washington County, Oregon District Attorney Kevin Barton and Washington County Sheriff Pat Garrett have issued a joint statement saying they do not want the repeal of Oregon Measure 105 and that "Our community is safer when citizens and non-citizens alike report crimes and testify in court so we can arrest and prosecute criminals." I agree.
Labels:
assault,
crime,
criminals,
human rights,
immigrants,
immigration,
law,
legal,
Oregon,
rapists
Wednesday, September 26, 2018
Globalization
If you paid attention in history class, you learned over and over how humans have always lived in a global society with frequent migrations: the hunger people had for spices, silks, food and items from other countries has always been there, different languages have always influenced each other, there has always been a global economy and while country and borders may change frequently, the influence that different countries have on each other has always been present, and different groups have moved into new places.
To pretend that "globalization" is something new and something that threatens your country's sovereignty is disputed by at least 10,000 years of recent history.
Also, you can love your country and love experiencing food, music and customs from somewhere else. You can be proud of your country and acknowledge that another country does some things better. It is ignorant and misguided at best and arrogant and reckless at worst to think otherwise.
Once again, Donald Trump is wrong.
To pretend that "globalization" is something new and something that threatens your country's sovereignty is disputed by at least 10,000 years of recent history.
Also, you can love your country and love experiencing food, music and customs from somewhere else. You can be proud of your country and acknowledge that another country does some things better. It is ignorant and misguided at best and arrogant and reckless at worst to think otherwise.
Once again, Donald Trump is wrong.
Tuesday, September 18, 2018
what losing KLR means
Kawasaki is going to discontinue its KLR line of motorcycles. And I am sad.
I have a 2008 KLR. It is my second motorcycle. I'm the third owner. I bought it when it had just 3700 miles on it. I paid $3500 for it. I adore it. My KLR has taken me up and down gravel roads to gorgeous, remote camp sites and intriguing, hidden ghost towns and vistas too beautiful for words, as well as on many thousands of miles of pavement. My KLR has been to 10 states and provinces in the USA and Canada, and in 2020, it's taking me through Baja, Mexico. In addition to making me an "adventure rider," my KLR also been my backup transportation when I need to take short trips around town.
Though this is an "adventure" or "dual sport" bike, I'll probably never do a back country discovery route (BDR) with my KLR, because those "roads" are beyond my skills, but my KLR could! I may have struggled to get to Silver City, Idaho via the back road from Jordan Valley, Oregon, but my KLR didn't at ALL.
In addition to loving all that my KLR is capable of, and how easy it was for my husband to do things to it so that it was low enough for me to ride (I'm 5' 4"), and how durable it is (I've dropped it twice), this motorcycle is affordable, even if you buy it new. You can get a new KLR for about $6700. By contrast, other dual sport motorcycles cost FAR more: a new Honda Africa Twin costs about $13,500. A new BMW F 700 GS costs about $10,000. A new F 800 GS is $12,300. A new F 800 GS Adventure is almost $14,000. That doesn't even get into the 1000 and 1200s.
What the KLR has given me access to is hard to put into words, but I'll try: it's been central to maintaining any physical and mental health I've held onto through my 40s and into my 50s.
And that's why I am so sad to hear that the KLR is going away. According to Tri County Honda Yamaha Kawasaki Polaris in West Virginia, Kawasaki announced on September 15 that, after 31 years of production, the company has discontinued production of the KLR. Apparently, it isn't selling well.
My fear is that this is another step making adventure motorcycle riding only for people who are financially elite. I can't afford to spend $10,000 on anything at this point in my life, and probably never will. And I'm far from alone in being in that position financially.
If KLR sales are slumping, as they are for Harley Davidson, then Kawasaki has only itself to blame. I think all motorcycle companies do a LOUSY job of marketing. LOUSY. They will spend many thousands of dollars on photo sessions with greased-up almost-naked women, standing in high heels next to a motorcycle they don't know how to ride, but motorcycle companies won't bother to contact women who actually ride and that post fantastic photos of the places their motorcycles take them and say to them, "Hey, could we pay you a few hundred bucks to use these amazing photos in an ad campaign?" There's Facebook groups for women motorcycle riders, including niche groups like Women Adventure Riders for women that ride dual sport motorcycles. Are motorcycle dealers, designers and gear shops monitoring these groups and looking to see what REAL customers are saying? I rarely see product placement in movies or TV shows for motorcycles - do you know what it would do for sales to see a character in a halfway popular TV show riding a motorcycle even SOMETIMES? And I have never seen a motorcycle dealer have a display at a big event that attracts people under 50 or women - not at large concerts, not at big outdoor expos... Why not?
There are so many people, particularly women, who think about riding a motorcycle but have no idea where to begin - I know because they approach me all the time when they meet me standing next to my bike or when they find out that I ride, in gas stations and grocery store parking lots and at rest stops and campgrounds. They are buzzing with questions and then start with their comments about how much they would love to learn to ride but don't know where to begin. They also write me because of this page on my web site talking about how I got started riding and this page on how I started riding a dual sport. Why do they approach me? Because I'm approachable - I'm an overweight 50ish woman riding backroads and having an amazing time and I won't shame anyone for being hesitant or intimidated for their questions about riding a motorcycle, including off-road. I'm no Dakar Rally rider, and they see me and realize they don't have to be either to take a gravel road to somewhere really amazing.
I promote motorcycle riding because of my passion for it - imagine what I could do if I had something to sell, if this were my full time, paid job!
The motorcycle industry, at least in the USA, cannot operate the way it has for decades. It must change and it must cultivate new riders, not just hope people will come along. Baby boomers are aging out of their motorcycle riding years, and middle-aged and young adults are burdened with debt - and getting rid of affordable motorcycles is going to further turn them away. Plus, the demographics of our nation is changing drastically - and that means the customers for any product are changing drastically. By 2050, the USA will be a place where white people will no longer be in the majority: our minority population, currently 30 percent, is expected to exceed 50 percent before 2050. In fact, most of America’s net population growth will be among its minorities, as well as in a growing mixed-race population. Latino and Asian populations are expected to nearly triple. What is the image of motorcycle riding that will make this changing demographic want to ride? The peace of mind? The adventure? The fun? The empowerment? The zen? The escape? The feeling of connection to the environment and the road? The role someone assumes as a motorcycle rider, a role that is far different from that of their day job, as a software developer, a checkout clerk, a delivery driver, an accountant, a Mom?
If the motorcycle industry takes away affordable adventure motorcycles, they can kiss that part of their industry goodbye, because it WILL die out. Is that really what they want?
And if you DO have a motorcycle, check out the fantastic products my husband has to offer:
Adventure Motorcycle Luggage & Accessories
www.coyotetrips.com
Aluminum Panniers and Top Cases,
Top Case Adapter Plates,
Tough Motorcycle Fuel Containers, & More
Designed or Curated by an experienced adventure motorcycle world traveler
Based in Oregon
You won't find these exact products and this level of quality, at this price, anywhere else - available only from Coyotetrips
Also see:
Nonprofits can learn from motorcycle manufacturers? Yes!
I have a 2008 KLR. It is my second motorcycle. I'm the third owner. I bought it when it had just 3700 miles on it. I paid $3500 for it. I adore it. My KLR has taken me up and down gravel roads to gorgeous, remote camp sites and intriguing, hidden ghost towns and vistas too beautiful for words, as well as on many thousands of miles of pavement. My KLR has been to 10 states and provinces in the USA and Canada, and in 2020, it's taking me through Baja, Mexico. In addition to making me an "adventure rider," my KLR also been my backup transportation when I need to take short trips around town.
Though this is an "adventure" or "dual sport" bike, I'll probably never do a back country discovery route (BDR) with my KLR, because those "roads" are beyond my skills, but my KLR could! I may have struggled to get to Silver City, Idaho via the back road from Jordan Valley, Oregon, but my KLR didn't at ALL.
In addition to loving all that my KLR is capable of, and how easy it was for my husband to do things to it so that it was low enough for me to ride (I'm 5' 4"), and how durable it is (I've dropped it twice), this motorcycle is affordable, even if you buy it new. You can get a new KLR for about $6700. By contrast, other dual sport motorcycles cost FAR more: a new Honda Africa Twin costs about $13,500. A new BMW F 700 GS costs about $10,000. A new F 800 GS is $12,300. A new F 800 GS Adventure is almost $14,000. That doesn't even get into the 1000 and 1200s.
What the KLR has given me access to is hard to put into words, but I'll try: it's been central to maintaining any physical and mental health I've held onto through my 40s and into my 50s.
And that's why I am so sad to hear that the KLR is going away. According to Tri County Honda Yamaha Kawasaki Polaris in West Virginia, Kawasaki announced on September 15 that, after 31 years of production, the company has discontinued production of the KLR. Apparently, it isn't selling well.
My fear is that this is another step making adventure motorcycle riding only for people who are financially elite. I can't afford to spend $10,000 on anything at this point in my life, and probably never will. And I'm far from alone in being in that position financially.
If KLR sales are slumping, as they are for Harley Davidson, then Kawasaki has only itself to blame. I think all motorcycle companies do a LOUSY job of marketing. LOUSY. They will spend many thousands of dollars on photo sessions with greased-up almost-naked women, standing in high heels next to a motorcycle they don't know how to ride, but motorcycle companies won't bother to contact women who actually ride and that post fantastic photos of the places their motorcycles take them and say to them, "Hey, could we pay you a few hundred bucks to use these amazing photos in an ad campaign?" There's Facebook groups for women motorcycle riders, including niche groups like Women Adventure Riders for women that ride dual sport motorcycles. Are motorcycle dealers, designers and gear shops monitoring these groups and looking to see what REAL customers are saying? I rarely see product placement in movies or TV shows for motorcycles - do you know what it would do for sales to see a character in a halfway popular TV show riding a motorcycle even SOMETIMES? And I have never seen a motorcycle dealer have a display at a big event that attracts people under 50 or women - not at large concerts, not at big outdoor expos... Why not?
There are so many people, particularly women, who think about riding a motorcycle but have no idea where to begin - I know because they approach me all the time when they meet me standing next to my bike or when they find out that I ride, in gas stations and grocery store parking lots and at rest stops and campgrounds. They are buzzing with questions and then start with their comments about how much they would love to learn to ride but don't know where to begin. They also write me because of this page on my web site talking about how I got started riding and this page on how I started riding a dual sport. Why do they approach me? Because I'm approachable - I'm an overweight 50ish woman riding backroads and having an amazing time and I won't shame anyone for being hesitant or intimidated for their questions about riding a motorcycle, including off-road. I'm no Dakar Rally rider, and they see me and realize they don't have to be either to take a gravel road to somewhere really amazing.
I promote motorcycle riding because of my passion for it - imagine what I could do if I had something to sell, if this were my full time, paid job!
The motorcycle industry, at least in the USA, cannot operate the way it has for decades. It must change and it must cultivate new riders, not just hope people will come along. Baby boomers are aging out of their motorcycle riding years, and middle-aged and young adults are burdened with debt - and getting rid of affordable motorcycles is going to further turn them away. Plus, the demographics of our nation is changing drastically - and that means the customers for any product are changing drastically. By 2050, the USA will be a place where white people will no longer be in the majority: our minority population, currently 30 percent, is expected to exceed 50 percent before 2050. In fact, most of America’s net population growth will be among its minorities, as well as in a growing mixed-race population. Latino and Asian populations are expected to nearly triple. What is the image of motorcycle riding that will make this changing demographic want to ride? The peace of mind? The adventure? The fun? The empowerment? The zen? The escape? The feeling of connection to the environment and the road? The role someone assumes as a motorcycle rider, a role that is far different from that of their day job, as a software developer, a checkout clerk, a delivery driver, an accountant, a Mom?
If the motorcycle industry takes away affordable adventure motorcycles, they can kiss that part of their industry goodbye, because it WILL die out. Is that really what they want?
And if you DO have a motorcycle, check out the fantastic products my husband has to offer:
Adventure Motorcycle Luggage & Accessories
www.coyotetrips.com
Aluminum Panniers and Top Cases,
Top Case Adapter Plates,
Tough Motorcycle Fuel Containers, & More
Designed or Curated by an experienced adventure motorcycle world traveler
Based in Oregon
You won't find these exact products and this level of quality, at this price, anywhere else - available only from Coyotetrips
Also see:
Nonprofits can learn from motorcycle manufacturers? Yes!
Labels:
advrider,
bikers,
bikes,
motorbikes,
motorcycles,
motos,
riding
Tuesday, August 21, 2018
2018 Nevada motorcycle trip
In the last two weeks of July, we went on our annual two-week motorcycle trip. This time, we toured Nevada, as well as parts of Oregon and a wee bit of California. We spent 13 days, going over 2657 miles / 4276 kilometers. We stayed at the historic hotel in French Glen, Oregon, rode around Steens Mountain, rode most of US Highway 50 in Nevada (the "loneliest road in the USA"), visited Eureka, Ely, Rachel and Tonopah, Nevada, stayed two nights in Great Basin National Park, stayed a night in Cathedral Gorge State Park and took the Extraterrestrial Highway.
You can read the travelogue or go straight to the photos.
As always, my goal isn't so much hey, look what I did! as it is here's advice if you want to do something similar.
Labels:
female,
motorcycle,
motorcycling,
motorcyclist,
rider,
tour,
touring,
travel,
woman,
women
Saturday, August 18, 2018
Milestone
As of this week, I have lived in the town where I live in Oregon longer than any one, single place, since I moved from Kentucky. The previous record was Sinzig, Germany - I lived there, in one place, for 4 years and 7 months.
I have already lived in Oregon longer than I lived in any other state, except Kentucky, and longer than I lived in Germany.
And, yet... the town where I live isn't home. Oregon isn't home. It's just where I live.
Part of the reason I feel this way is probably because I have moved so often since I left for university when I was 18. After just three years, I start feeling restless. It's not that I enjoy packing and unpacking - I don't, at ALL. I hate it. But I love getting to know a new place, discovering new places to see and new things to do. However, inevitably, I run out of new things to see and do. In addition, I don't seem to be able to find something to keep me tied to a place for long: jobs end, organizations close, volunteering fizzles when a leader changes, friends move, relationships fizzle, people turn out not to be who I thought they were, favorite places close up...
While Texas didn't quite suit me, I never felt like I didn't belong there, that I was unwelcomed there. I never got any attitude from native Texans about not being one myself. And you would think that wouldn't be the case, since no state has as many songs celebrating it as that state does. I love the Lyle Lovett Song That's Right, You're Not From Texas (but Texas Wants You Anyway). It so sums up how I felt there. If it weren't for the heat of the summer and Fall, I would have stayed. I made friends in Austin that are still my friends to this day - though I met all of them because of an online community for a particular kind of music we all love, not just through everyday interactions.
By contrast, in Oregon, if you aren't born here, you aren't wanted here, and those who are born here will say it online and to your face without hesitation. If you moved here from California - oh, heaven forbid you moved here from California. And Oregonians take it further: if you aren't born in the town where you live, they resent any actions you take to influence how things are done in the town: how the police conduct their business, how neighborhoods are defined, how schools are run, whatever. I have never lived in a place where politicians who aren't from a place have to emphasize how many years they have lived here, as if to justify their getting to live here, let alone run for office.
Since moving to Oregon - and particularly since moving to the town where I live in 2013 - I have looked for online communities and offline, onsite groups to join, volunteering, live music venues and arts scenes that would give me what I had in Austin: a feeling of belonging, a feeling of home. I have never made such a deliberate effort to get to know as many neighbors as possible. And nothing has worked out to make me feel like, yes, this is where I love living, this is where I belong.
Days after moving to Oregon, I felt like I had made a colossal mistake. The state, and Portland, weren't at all what I had envisioned or what people said about them. But after a year of floundering and whining, I decided I was going to be deliberate every day in finding something to like about where I'd chosen to live and deliberate in finding something enjoyable. That deliberation has lasted a full eight years. It's taken work and determination and I'm glad to have done it - I have found some amazing things in this state, including right here in Washington County where I live. Most native Oregonians haven't seen most of what I've seen in their state. I am frequently told by people right here in the town where I live, after telling them about something nearby, "Wow, I never even knew that was there. You know this place better than me." Treating Oregon as a place to explore, just like I do when I'm traveling, has been a great way to approach living here.
But my determination is wearing thin. Once again, as I've done so many, many times in my life, I am wondering, where do I belong? Where is home? That place that feels safe and welcoming and comfortable... that place you go for rest after the travel and adventures - where is my place? Because, after all this time, if it's not here, it never will be.
I still long for that moment of going to a place and thinking, yes, this is where I want to live, for the rest of my life, absolutely. And I know that it is a privilege to be able to choose where you live, one that is denied most people on Earth. So I feel selfish - unbelievably selfish - for feeling this way. But it's how I feel.
I do love my house. I just wish I could move it.
I have already lived in Oregon longer than I lived in any other state, except Kentucky, and longer than I lived in Germany.
And, yet... the town where I live isn't home. Oregon isn't home. It's just where I live.
Part of the reason I feel this way is probably because I have moved so often since I left for university when I was 18. After just three years, I start feeling restless. It's not that I enjoy packing and unpacking - I don't, at ALL. I hate it. But I love getting to know a new place, discovering new places to see and new things to do. However, inevitably, I run out of new things to see and do. In addition, I don't seem to be able to find something to keep me tied to a place for long: jobs end, organizations close, volunteering fizzles when a leader changes, friends move, relationships fizzle, people turn out not to be who I thought they were, favorite places close up...
While Texas didn't quite suit me, I never felt like I didn't belong there, that I was unwelcomed there. I never got any attitude from native Texans about not being one myself. And you would think that wouldn't be the case, since no state has as many songs celebrating it as that state does. I love the Lyle Lovett Song That's Right, You're Not From Texas (but Texas Wants You Anyway). It so sums up how I felt there. If it weren't for the heat of the summer and Fall, I would have stayed. I made friends in Austin that are still my friends to this day - though I met all of them because of an online community for a particular kind of music we all love, not just through everyday interactions.
By contrast, in Oregon, if you aren't born here, you aren't wanted here, and those who are born here will say it online and to your face without hesitation. If you moved here from California - oh, heaven forbid you moved here from California. And Oregonians take it further: if you aren't born in the town where you live, they resent any actions you take to influence how things are done in the town: how the police conduct their business, how neighborhoods are defined, how schools are run, whatever. I have never lived in a place where politicians who aren't from a place have to emphasize how many years they have lived here, as if to justify their getting to live here, let alone run for office.
Since moving to Oregon - and particularly since moving to the town where I live in 2013 - I have looked for online communities and offline, onsite groups to join, volunteering, live music venues and arts scenes that would give me what I had in Austin: a feeling of belonging, a feeling of home. I have never made such a deliberate effort to get to know as many neighbors as possible. And nothing has worked out to make me feel like, yes, this is where I love living, this is where I belong.
Days after moving to Oregon, I felt like I had made a colossal mistake. The state, and Portland, weren't at all what I had envisioned or what people said about them. But after a year of floundering and whining, I decided I was going to be deliberate every day in finding something to like about where I'd chosen to live and deliberate in finding something enjoyable. That deliberation has lasted a full eight years. It's taken work and determination and I'm glad to have done it - I have found some amazing things in this state, including right here in Washington County where I live. Most native Oregonians haven't seen most of what I've seen in their state. I am frequently told by people right here in the town where I live, after telling them about something nearby, "Wow, I never even knew that was there. You know this place better than me." Treating Oregon as a place to explore, just like I do when I'm traveling, has been a great way to approach living here.
But my determination is wearing thin. Once again, as I've done so many, many times in my life, I am wondering, where do I belong? Where is home? That place that feels safe and welcoming and comfortable... that place you go for rest after the travel and adventures - where is my place? Because, after all this time, if it's not here, it never will be.
I still long for that moment of going to a place and thinking, yes, this is where I want to live, for the rest of my life, absolutely. And I know that it is a privilege to be able to choose where you live, one that is denied most people on Earth. So I feel selfish - unbelievably selfish - for feeling this way. But it's how I feel.
I do love my house. I just wish I could move it.
Friday, August 17, 2018
When Father's Hurt, Even Kill, & Their Family Defends Them
Last month, a man in Utah was arrested for domestic violence. Hours after he was released from jail, he flew a small plane into his house. His wife and son escaped the house after the plane crash, but he died.
The day after the incident, I heard a comment from his daughter: "He’s not this person that’s being portrayed."
It's a jaw-dropping, but typical, comment from family and friends of men who attempt to harm or kill a family member or colleague or even a stranger, and it infuriates me.
This man attempted to kill his wife and, very possibly, wanted to kill his son as well. That's not a media portrayal, it's just the facts: the man drove to an airport, he boarded a plane his company owned, he got clearance for takeoff and he flew that plane into his family's home.
I'm always stunned by family members and friends in denial about a person that commits a violent act. It's a denial that results in comments like what his daughter said. Or comments by a woman that is frequently the target of her husband's physical or mental abuse. You don't know him. He's not always like this. He's more than this. This isn't him.
This IS him. A violent family member can be a very nice, supportive person sometimes, even most of the time. Just like a co-worker may be a fantastic colleague, someone you trust absolutely, and later you find out that person subjected another co-worker to sexual harassment. The good times are, indeed, who they are - but the oh-so-bad times are too.
Sometimes, the news hits too close to home. And this is one of those times. I wonder how many family members are silent as they hear this daughter deny her father's violence, who think, This is exactly who he was. But they will never say so...
The day after the incident, I heard a comment from his daughter: "He’s not this person that’s being portrayed."
It's a jaw-dropping, but typical, comment from family and friends of men who attempt to harm or kill a family member or colleague or even a stranger, and it infuriates me.
This man attempted to kill his wife and, very possibly, wanted to kill his son as well. That's not a media portrayal, it's just the facts: the man drove to an airport, he boarded a plane his company owned, he got clearance for takeoff and he flew that plane into his family's home.
I'm always stunned by family members and friends in denial about a person that commits a violent act. It's a denial that results in comments like what his daughter said. Or comments by a woman that is frequently the target of her husband's physical or mental abuse. You don't know him. He's not always like this. He's more than this. This isn't him.
This IS him. A violent family member can be a very nice, supportive person sometimes, even most of the time. Just like a co-worker may be a fantastic colleague, someone you trust absolutely, and later you find out that person subjected another co-worker to sexual harassment. The good times are, indeed, who they are - but the oh-so-bad times are too.
Sometimes, the news hits too close to home. And this is one of those times. I wonder how many family members are silent as they hear this daughter deny her father's violence, who think, This is exactly who he was. But they will never say so...
Sunday, July 15, 2018
Uncle Minnie
My maternal grandmother passed away last year. She was 101. She didn't tell me many stories when I was growing up, in contrast to my paternal grandmother, but she did tell me a few here and there when I was an adult and would visit my hometown every few years. When I was researching my family tree, I interviewed her for information, and at one point in that conversation, she told me about her "Uncle Minnie."
Minnie Howard was the daughter of the sister of my great great grandmother. It was her mother who was my aunt - my great great aunt and, therefore, Uncle Minnie was, in fact, my first cousin thrice removed.
Uncle Minnie was born in 1896. She lived all of her life in Alabama. And, according to my grandmother, Uncle Minnie was called "Uncle" because she wore men's clothes and dated a woman.
According to the 1930 United States Federal Census, Uncle Minnie was living with her mother in Perry County, Alabama, in a home they owned. She was 34 years old, though the Census form lists her birth year incorrectly. She's listed as the head of the household, as single, and as working as a farmer. The census says she didn't attend school but that she could read and write. At the top of the census form, for everyone listed on that particular form, it says that the "township or other division of county" for where she lived is Scott or Scotts Beat, District 4 in Perry County. There is no Scotts or Scotts Beat listed on any modern maps of Alabama, but after a lot of searching, I found some obituary online for someone I don't know that says "Scott's Beat" is "about eight miles west of Marion."
I never asked more questions about her when my grandmother said why she was called "Uncle Minnie" because I was so shocked that my grandmother was talking about such a thing - my brain completely froze. My grandmother was deeply religious - she was a Baptist and her husband, my grandfather, was a Methodist and after more than 75 years of marriage, on his deathbed, she STILL tried to get him dunked! But there she was, telling me matter-of-factly that my first cousin thrice removed dressed as a man and dated a woman - no judgment, no condemnation. She could have been telling me her hair was blond and had a mule named Daisy.
I like to imagine Uncle Minnie at 30 or so, in a formal men's suit, hair slicked back, looking like Marlene Dietrich. Maybe she's wearing a beret. Elegant. Mysterious. But the reality is that, as a farmer in very rural Alabama, she was probably in denim overalls and boots most of the time, not at all elegant, maybe even being perceived as a man by people who saw her and didn't know her. Further contributing to the denim overalls and boots theory is that she died February 14, 1971, gored to death by a cow that she was trying to separate from a calf. The article says she was "one of the largest cotton and cattle farmers in this part of the state, operating a farm of almost a thousand acres, partly in Hale County and the remainder in Perry."
Uncle Minnie died at 65. She's buried at Mount Hermon United Methodist Church Cemetery in Mount Hermon, Hale County, Alabama.
With no legal spouse and no children, I'm afraid she's going to be lost to history - as most of us are. But I don't want her to be. Even if she didn't look like Marlene Dietrich.
Minnie Howard was the daughter of the sister of my great great grandmother. It was her mother who was my aunt - my great great aunt and, therefore, Uncle Minnie was, in fact, my first cousin thrice removed.
Uncle Minnie was born in 1896. She lived all of her life in Alabama. And, according to my grandmother, Uncle Minnie was called "Uncle" because she wore men's clothes and dated a woman.
According to the 1930 United States Federal Census, Uncle Minnie was living with her mother in Perry County, Alabama, in a home they owned. She was 34 years old, though the Census form lists her birth year incorrectly. She's listed as the head of the household, as single, and as working as a farmer. The census says she didn't attend school but that she could read and write. At the top of the census form, for everyone listed on that particular form, it says that the "township or other division of county" for where she lived is Scott or Scotts Beat, District 4 in Perry County. There is no Scotts or Scotts Beat listed on any modern maps of Alabama, but after a lot of searching, I found some obituary online for someone I don't know that says "Scott's Beat" is "about eight miles west of Marion."
I never asked more questions about her when my grandmother said why she was called "Uncle Minnie" because I was so shocked that my grandmother was talking about such a thing - my brain completely froze. My grandmother was deeply religious - she was a Baptist and her husband, my grandfather, was a Methodist and after more than 75 years of marriage, on his deathbed, she STILL tried to get him dunked! But there she was, telling me matter-of-factly that my first cousin thrice removed dressed as a man and dated a woman - no judgment, no condemnation. She could have been telling me her hair was blond and had a mule named Daisy.
I like to imagine Uncle Minnie at 30 or so, in a formal men's suit, hair slicked back, looking like Marlene Dietrich. Maybe she's wearing a beret. Elegant. Mysterious. But the reality is that, as a farmer in very rural Alabama, she was probably in denim overalls and boots most of the time, not at all elegant, maybe even being perceived as a man by people who saw her and didn't know her. Further contributing to the denim overalls and boots theory is that she died February 14, 1971, gored to death by a cow that she was trying to separate from a calf. The article says she was "one of the largest cotton and cattle farmers in this part of the state, operating a farm of almost a thousand acres, partly in Hale County and the remainder in Perry."
Uncle Minnie died at 65. She's buried at Mount Hermon United Methodist Church Cemetery in Mount Hermon, Hale County, Alabama.
With no legal spouse and no children, I'm afraid she's going to be lost to history - as most of us are. But I don't want her to be. Even if she didn't look like Marlene Dietrich.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)